CVE-2024-4712
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAn arbitrary file creation vulnerability exists in PaperCut NG/MF that only affects Windows servers with Web Print enabled. This specific flaw exists within the image-handler process, which can incorrectly create files that don’t exist when a maliciously formed payload is provided. This can lead to local privilege escalation. Note: This CVE has been split into two (CVE-2024-4712 and CVE-2024-8405) and it’s been rescored with a "Privileges Required (PR)" rating of low, and “Attack Complexity (AC)” rating of low, reflecting the worst-case scenario where an Administrator has granted local login access to standard network users on the host server.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA file creation vulnerability in PaperCut NG/MF's image-handler process on Windows servers with Web Print enabled allows authenticated low-privilege users to create arbitrary files on the server, leading to local privilege escalation. The image-handler incorrectly creates files that don't exist when processing maliciously crafted payloads.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 23.0.9< 23.0.9CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm Windows server platformVerify the operating system is Windows. This vulnerability only affects PaperCut installations on Windows servers.Affected if The server is running a non-Windows operating system (the vulnerability is Windows-specific).
-
Check installed PaperCut versionLocate the PaperCut installation directory and check the version. Common paths include C:\Program Files\PaperCut MF\ or C:\Program Files\PaperCut NG\. Look for a version file or check the admin console for the exact version number.Affected if The installed version is older than 23.0.9 (both MF and NG versions below 23.0.9 are affected).
-
Verify Web Print is enabledAccess the PaperCut admin interface, navigate to Web Print settings, and check whether the Web Print feature is currently enabled for users.Affected if Web Print is enabled - this is a required condition for the vulnerability to be exploitable.
-
Check for low-privilege user accessReview PaperCut user accounts and their permission levels. Specifically identify whether standard network users (non-admin) have authenticated access to the PaperCut system.Affected if Standard network users have authenticated access to PaperCut - the vulnerability allows these low-privilege users to create arbitrary files.
A Windows server running PaperCut MF or NG version below 23.0.9 with Web Print enabled and authenticated low-privilege users present is affected by this vulnerability.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped23.0.9
Disable Web Print if not required, restrict local login access for standard network users, and apply vendor patches when available. Review user permissions and ensure least-privilege principles are enforced.
PaperCut NG/MF version 23.0.9 or later
- 1. Check current PaperCut NG/MF version by logging into the admin interface and navigating to Help > About, or checking the server's version information
- 2. Confirm Web Print is enabled on the Windows server (this vulnerability only affects systems with Web Print enabled)
- 3. Download PaperCut NG/MF version 23.0.9 or later from the official PaperCut vendor website at www.papercut.com
- 4. Back up the existing PaperCut installation and database before upgrading
- 5. Install the updated version following PaperCut's standard upgrade procedures
- 6. After installation, verify the new version is running (should show version 23.0.9 or higher)
- 7. Confirm Web Print functionality is working correctly post-upgrade
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,168.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-4712 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-4712 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data