MxsecurityApplication · Moxa

CVE-2024-4740

HIGH · 7.5 CVSS v3.1 Published 2024-10-18
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to after 1.1.0 or later.
See remediation →
84/100
Remediation priority · High
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
MXsecurity software versions v1.1.0 and prior are vulnerable because of the use of hard-coded credentials. This vulnerability could allow an attacker to tamper with sensitive data.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

MXsecurity software versions v1.1.0 and prior contain hard-coded credentials embedded in the application code or configuration, allowing authenticated or unauthenticated attackers to access sensitive functions and tamper with sensitive data.

MitigationReplace all hard-coded credentials with dynamic secrets management (e.g., environment variables, secure vaults) and implement credential rotation; verify all authentication pathways after remediation.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
MxsecurityApplication
Affected:<= 1.1.0

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
High
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify installed Mxsecurity version
    Access the Mxsecurity admin interface or check the software package/binary version information using the system's package manager or application 'About' section
    Affected if The installed version is 1.1.0 or any earlier version (e.g., 1.0.x)
  2. Locate configuration files
    Search the Mxsecurity installation directory for configuration files such as config.xml, application.properties, settings.conf, or similar files that store credentials
    Affected if Configuration files contain embedded username/password strings that appear hard-coded rather than dynamically loaded from environment variables or secrets vaults
  3. Examine application binaries or scripts
    Inspect Mxsecurity executable files, scripts, or DLLs using text search tools (e.g., grep, strings) for known credential patterns like 'password=', 'username=', 'api_key=', or base64-encoded credential strings
    Affected if Binary or script files contain hard-coded plaintext or obfuscated credentials used for authentication
  4. Review database connection settings
    Check database configuration files or connection strings within the Mxsecurity installation for embedded usernames and passwords
    Affected if Database credentials are stored in plain text within configuration files rather than being retrieved from a secure secrets manager
  5. Check for default credential references
    Search installation directories for files named 'credentials', 'keys', 'secrets', or containing terms like 'default_password', 'admin_password', or 'hardcoded'
    Affected if Files contain default or hard-coded credential values that would be identical across installations

A user is affected if their Moxa Mxsecurity installation is version 1.1.0 or earlier AND contains hard-coded credentials in configuration files, application code, or scripts.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Upgrade available Upgrade to a release after 1.1.0
Interim mitigation

Replace all hard-coded credentials with dynamic secrets management (e.g., environment variables, secure vaults) and implement credential rotation; verify all authentication pathways after remediation.

Fix this in Mxsecurity Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation8.0 h
  • Testing4.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
18.0 hours of engineering $3,200
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,120.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-4740 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-4740 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data