CVE-2024-4742
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe Youzify – BuddyPress Community, User Profile, Social Network & Membership Plugin for WordPress plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to SQL Injection via the order_by shortcode attribute in all versions up to, and including, 1.2.5 due to insufficient escaping on the user supplied parameter and lack of sufficient preparation on the existing SQL query. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Contributor-level access and above, to append additional SQL queries into already existing queries that can be used to extract sensitive information from the database.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe Youzify WordPress plugin fails to properly sanitize and escape the order_by shortcode attribute parameter before using it in an SQL query. An authenticated attacker with Contributor-level access or higher can inject malicious SQL queries through this parameter to exfiltrate sensitive data from the database.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 1.2.5CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify Youzify plugin is installedAccess WordPress admin dashboard, go to Plugins > Installed Plugins. Look for 'Youzify' or 'Youzify - BuddyPress Community' in the list of active plugins.Affected if Youzify plugin appears in the WordPress plugins list and is active.
-
Check installed Youzify versionIn WordPress admin, go to Plugins > Installed Plugins. Click on the Youzify plugin to view details, or check the plugin's main PHP file (usually youzify.php) for the 'Version' header in the file comment block.Affected if The installed version is 1.2.5 or lower.
-
Confirm shortcode usage capabilityVerify that the site allows authenticated users with Contributor-level or higher access to create or edit content containing shortcodes. Check if the [youzify] shortcode is registered and available by viewing plugin source code for add_shortcode('youzify', ...) function.Affected if The Youzify shortcode is registered and the site permits contributor-level users to insert shortcodes in posts/pages.
-
Identify vulnerable parameter usageSearch plugin source code for the SQL query that uses the order_by parameter. Look in the plugin's main file or related PHP files for queries containing $order_by or $_GET/$_POST['order_by'] directly in SQL statements without proper prepared statements or sanitization.Affected if Code inspection reveals the order_by parameter is used in SQL queries without prepared statements or $wpdb->prepare() with proper placeholder escaping.
A site is affected if Youzify plugin version 1.2.5 or lower is installed and active, and the order_by shortcode parameter can be manipulated by authenticated users.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpdate the Youzify plugin to version 1.2.6 or later which contains the security patch for this SQL injection vulnerability.
Youzify version 1.2.6 or later (check WordPress plugin repository for latest available version)
- Check the WordPress plugin repository for Youzify to identify if a newer version than 1.2.5 has been released
- If a newer version (typically 1.2.6 or higher) is available, navigate to Plugins > Add New > Upload in WordPress admin
- Deactivate and delete the current Youzify plugin installation
- Upload and install the newer fixed version of Youzify
- Reactivate the plugin
- Verify the order_by shortcode functionality works correctly after the update
- Ensure users with Contributor-level or higher access are aware of proper parameter handling if needed
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation3.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,272.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-4742 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-4742 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data