Powerflex ManagerApplication · Dell

CVE-2024-47477

MEDIUM · 6.5 CVSS v3.1 Published 2026-06-17
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 4.5.1.1 or later.
See remediation →
74/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Dell PowerFlex Manager, versions prior to 4.5.1.1, contain an improper certificate validation vulnerability. A remote unauthenticated attacker could potentially exploit this vulnerability leading to man-in-the-middle attack in tandem with DNS cache poisoning.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

Dell PowerFlex Manager versions prior to 4.5.1.1 contain an improper certificate validation vulnerability that allows a remote unauthenticated attacker to potentially conduct man-in-the-middle attacks, especially when combined with DNS cache poisoning. The vulnerability stems from inadequate validation of SSL/TLS certificates during secure communications.

MitigationUpgrade Dell PowerFlex Manager to version 4.5.1.1 or later to obtain the fixed certificate validation logic.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Powerflex ManagerApplication
Affected:< 4.5.1.1

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
Low
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Confirm Dell PowerFlex Manager is installed
    Locate the PowerFlex Manager installation by checking for the product service or management interface, typically accessible via the product's web UI or command-line interface if installed on the system
    Affected if PowerFlex Manager is not present on the system
  2. Identify the installed PowerFlex Manager version
    Access the product's web interface, about page, or use the appropriate command-line tool provided by Dell to query the installed version number
    Affected if The version returned is less than 4.5.1.1 (for example, 4.5.0.0, 4.0.x, or any version prior to 4.5.1.1)
  3. Verify SSL/TLS secure communications are enabled
    Check the PowerFlex Manager configuration settings for SSL/TLS certificate usage, typically found in the security or communication settings of the management interface
    Affected if Secure communications with SSL/TLS certificate validation are configured and active

The environment is affected if Dell PowerFlex Manager is installed with a version prior to 4.5.1.1 and SSL/TLS secure communications are enabled, as this combination allows the improper certificate validation vulnerability to be exploitable.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Upgrade available Upgrade to 4.5.1.1 or later
Fixed in 4.5.1.1
Interim mitigation

Upgrade Dell PowerFlex Manager to version 4.5.1.1 or later to obtain the fixed certificate validation logic.

Recommended fix High confidence

PowerFlex Manager 4.5.1.1

  1. 1. Back up the current PowerFlex Manager configuration and data according to Dell backup procedures
  2. 2. Download PowerFlex Manager version 4.5.1.1 or later from Dell Support (support.dell.com)
  3. 3. Review the upgrade documentation specific to your deployment model
  4. 4. Apply the upgrade following Dell's standard upgrade procedure for PowerFlex Manager
  5. 5. After upgrade, verify the certificate validation functionality is working correctly
  6. 6. Confirm the new version is reported as 4.5.1.1 or later

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Fix this in Powerflex Manager Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation6.0 h
  • Testing4.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
16.0 hours of engineering $2,840
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,544.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-47477 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-47477 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data