CVE-2024-47493
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA Missing Release of Memory after Effective Lifetime vulnerability in the Packet Forwarding Engine (PFE) of the Juniper Networks Junos OS on the MX Series platforms with Trio-based FPCs allows an unauthenticated, adjacent attacker to cause a Denial of Service (DoS). In case of channelized Modular Interface Cards (MICs), every physical interface flap operation will leak heap memory. Over a period of time, continuous physical interface flap operations causes local FPC to eventually run out of memory and crash. Below CLI command can be used to check the memory usage over a period of time: user@host> show chassis fpc Temp CPU Utilization (%) CPU Utilization (%) Memory Utilization (%) Slot State (C) Total Interrupt 1min 5min 15min DRAM (MB) Heap Buffer 0 Online 43 41 2 2048 49 14 1 Online 43 41 2 2048 49 14 2 Online 43 41 2 2048 49 14 This issue affects Junos OS on MX Series: * All versions before 21.2R3-S7, * from 21.4 before 21.4R3-S6, * from 22.1 before 22.1R3-S5, * from 22.2 before 22.2R3-S3, * from 22.3 before 22.3R3-S2, * from 22.4 before 22.4R3, * from 23.2 before 23.2R2, * from 23.4 before 23.4R2.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceMemory leak vulnerability in the Packet Forwarding Engine (PFE) on Juniper MX Series platforms with Trio-based FPCs. When channelized MICs experience physical interface flap operations, heap memory is leaked each time. Over sustained interface flapping, memory exhaustion causes the local FPC to crash, resulting in Denial of Service.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 21.2= 21.2= 21.4= 22.1= 22.2= 22.3= 22.4= 23.2= 23.4CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Adjacent
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify MX Series hardware with Trio-based FPCsRun 'show chassis hardware' and look for MX Series routers with FPCs that include Trio chipsets (typically MPC/MIC cards).Affected if The device is an MX Series router with Trio-based FPCs (MPC line cards).
-
Verify Junos OS version is within affected rangeRun 'show version' and compare the installed Junos version against: < 21.2, 21.2, 21.4, 22.1, 22.2, 22.3, 22.4, 23.2, or 23.4.Affected if The installed Junos version matches any of the listed affected versions.
-
Confirm channelized MICs are in useRun 'show interfaces terse' or 'show chassis fpc pic-status' to identify if channelized MICs (channelized SONET/SDH or channelized Ethernet interfaces) are configured and active.Affected if Channelized MICs are present and configured on the Trio-based FPC.
-
Monitor FPC heap memory for growthRun 'show chassis fpc' repeatedly over time and observe the Heap Memory Utilized field for each FPC. Compare values over several hours or days.Affected if Heap memory utilization shows continuous growth without returning to baseline, indicating a leak.
-
Check for physical interface flaps on channelized interfacesRun 'show interface statistics' on channelized interfaces to count flap events, or review system logs for interface flap messages.Affected if Frequent physical interface flaps are occurring on channelized MIC interfaces.
If the device is an MX Series with Trio-based FPCs, runs an affected Junos version, uses channelized MICs, and shows increasing heap memory on the FPC following interface flaps, the environment is likely affected by this CVE.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped21.2
Upgrade Junos OS to the fixed versions (21.2R3-S7, 21.4R3-S6, 22.1R3-S5, 22.2R3-S3, 22.3R3-S2, 22.4R3, 23.2R2, or 23.4R2 and later). Monitor FPC memory utilization using 'show chassis fpc' to detect abnormal heap growth indicative of the leak.
21.2R3-S7, 21.4R3-S6, 22.1R3-S5, 22.2R3-S3, 22.3R3-S2, 22.4R3, 23.2R2, or 23.4R2 (depending on which version branch you are upgrading from)
- 1. Identify the current Junos OS version running on the MX Series device using: show version
- 2. Determine which version branch your current code falls into (21.2, 21.4, 22.1, 22.2, 22.3, 22.4, 23.2, or 23.4)
- 3. Schedule a maintenance window for the upgrade procedure
- 4. Download the appropriate fixed release for your version branch from Juniper Networks support portal
- 5. Upload the Junos OS upgrade package to the device using: file copy or USB transfer
- 6. Install the upgrade using: request system software add <package> reboot
- 7. After reboot, verify the new version using: show version
- 8. Monitor memory utilization over time using: show chassis fpc to confirm the memory leak is resolved
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation6.0 h
- Implementation12.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $7,680.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-47493 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-47493 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data