JunosOperating system · Juniper

CVE-2024-47499

HIGH · 7.5 CVSS v3.1 Published 2024-10-11
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 21.2 or later.
See remediation →
84/100
Remediation priority · High
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
An Improper Check for Unusual or Exceptional Conditions vulnerability in the routing protocol daemon (RPD) of Juniper Networks Junos OS and Junos OS Evolved allows an unauthenticated, network based attacker to cause a Denial of Service (DoS).  In a scenario where BGP Monitoring Protocol (BMP) is configured with rib-in pre-policy monitoring, receiving a BGP update with a specifically malformed AS PATH attribute over an established BGP session, can cause an RPD crash and restart. This issue affects: Junos OS:  * All versions before 21.2R3-S8, * 21.4 versions before 21.4R3-S8, * 22.2 versions before 22.2R3-S4, * 22.3 versions before 22.3R3-S3, * 22.4 versions before 22.4R3-S2, * 23.2 versions before 23.2R2-S1, * 23.4 versions before 23.4R1-S2, 23.4R2; Junos OS Evolved: * All versions before 21.2R3-S8-EVO, * 21.4 versions before 21.4R3-S8-EVO, * 22.2 versions before 22.2R3-S4-EVO, * 22.3 versions before 22.3R3-S3-EVO, * 22.4 versions before 22.4R3-S2-EVO, * 23.2 versions before 23.2R2-S1-EVO, * 23.4 versions before 23.4R1-S2-EVO, 23.4R2-EVO.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

This vulnerability exists in Juniper's routing protocol daemon (RPD) when BGP Monitoring Protocol (BMP) is configured with rib-in pre-policy monitoring. An unauthenticated attacker can send a specifically malformed AS PATH attribute in a BGP update over an established BGP session, causing the RPD to crash and restart, resulting in denial of service.

MitigationUpgrade Junos OS or Junos OS Evolved to the specified patched versions (21.2R3-S8, 21.4R3-S8, 22.2R3-S4, 22.3R3-S3, 22.4R3-S2, 23.2R2-S1, or 23.4R1-S2/23.4R2 and later) for the respective branch. Until upgraded, consider disabling BMP rib-in pre-policy monitoring if not required.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
JunosOperating system
Affected:< 21.2= 21.2= 21.4= 22.2= 22.3= 22.4= 23.2= 23.4
Junos Os EvolvedOperating system
Affected:< 21.2= 21.2= 21.4= 22.2= 22.3= 22.4= 23.2= 23.4

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
None
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify Junos version
    Run 'show version' or 'show version detail' to obtain the installed Junos OS or Junos OS Evolved version
    Affected if The installed version matches one of the listed affected versions: any version < 21.2, or = 21.2, = 21.4, = 22.2, = 22.3, = 22.4, = 23.2, = 23.4
  2. Verify BMP is configured
    Run 'show configuration protocols bmp' to check if BGP Monitoring Protocol is enabled
    Affected if BMP configuration exists and the protocol is active
  3. Confirm rib-in pre-policy monitoring is enabled
    Run 'show configuration protocols bmp station <station-name>' and look for 'rib-in pre-policy' or 'monitor rib-in pre-policy' under the BMP station configuration
    Affected if The rib-in pre-policy monitoring option is explicitly configured under BMP
  4. Check for RPD crash logs
    Run 'show system crash' or examine /var/log/messages for recent rpd crash entries, looking for timestamps corresponding to the time window of interest
    Affected if Recent RPD crashes are present in the crash logs and BMP with rib-in pre-policy monitoring is configured

A system is affected if it runs a vulnerable Junos version, has BMP configured with rib-in pre-policy monitoring enabled, and shows evidence of RPD crashes.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Upgrade available Upgrade to 21.2 or later
Fixed in 21.2
Interim mitigation

Upgrade Junos OS or Junos OS Evolved to the specified patched versions (21.2R3-S8, 21.4R3-S8, 22.2R3-S4, 22.3R3-S3, 22.4R3-S2, 23.2R2-S1, or 23.4R1-S2/23.4R2 and later) for the respective branch. Until upgraded, consider disabling BMP rib-in pre-policy monitoring if not required.

Recommended fix High confidence

Upgrade to the latest S-release in your current branch (e.g., 21.2R3-S8, 21.4R3-S8, 22.2R3-S4, 22.3R3-S3, 22.4R3-S2, 23.2R2-S1, or 23.4R2) or later stable release. For Junos OS Evolved, use the corresponding -EVO versions.

  1. 1. Identify the currently installed Junos OS/Evolved version using 'show version' command
  2. 2. Determine the current branch (e.g., 21.2, 21.4, 22.2, 22.3, 22.4, 23.2, 23.4)
  3. 3. Upgrade to the latest S-release (service release) for your current branch that contains the fix: For 21.2 branch upgrade to 21.2R3-S8 or later, for 21.4 branch upgrade to 21.4R3-S8 or later, for 22.2 branch upgrade to 22.2R3-S4 or later, for 22.3 branch upgrade to 22.3R3-S3 or later, for 22.4 branch upgrade to 22.4R3-S2 or later, for 23.2 branch upgrade to 23.2R2-S1 or later, for 23.4 branch up
  4. 4. If currently on an older branch (e.g., pre-21.2), upgrade to the earliest fixed version (21.2R3-S8) or a later stable branch
  5. 5. If upgrading across major branches (e.g., from 21.x to 22.x), review Juniper's upgrade documentation for compatibility and required intermediate steps
  6. 6. After upgrade, verify RPD is running using 'show routing-engine' and confirm BGP sessions are stable
  7. 7. Monitor the system for any anomalies after applying the upgrade
Caveat When upgrading across major version branches (e.g., 21.x to 22.x or 22.x to 23.x), review Juniper's migration guides as configuration syntax and feature compatibility may require changes.

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Fix this in Junos Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation8.0 h
  • Testing8.0 h
  • Review / QA4.0 h
24.0 hours of engineering $4,160
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,656.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-47499 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-47499 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data