CVE-2024-47503
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAn Improper Check for Unusual or Exceptional Conditions vulnerability in the flow processing daemon (flowd) of Juniper Networks Junos OS on SRX4600 and SRX5000 Series allows an unauthenticated and logically adjacent attacker to cause a Denial-of-Service (DoS). If in a multicast scenario a sequence of specific PIM packets is received, this will cause a flowd crash and restart, which leads to momentary service interruption. This issue affects Junos OS on SRX 4600 and SRX 5000 Series: * All versions before 21.4R3-S9, * 22.2 versions before 22.2R3-S5, * 22.3 versions before 22.3R3-S4, * 22.4 versions before 22.4R3-S4, * 23.2 versions before 23.2R2-S2, * 23.4 versions before 23.4R2, * 24.2 versions before 24.2R1-S1, 24.2R2.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA vulnerability in the flow processing daemon (flowd) of Juniper Junos OS on SRX4600 and SRX5000 Series allows an unauthenticated adjacent attacker to cause DoS by sending specific PIM packets in a multicast scenario, triggering improper error handling that leads to flowd crash and restart.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 21.4= 21.4= 22.2= 22.3= 22.4= 23.2= 23.4= 24.2CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Adjacent
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify device modelRun 'show chassis hardware' or check the device model to confirm it is an SRX4600 or SRX5000 Series deviceAffected if Device is SRX4600 or SRX5000 Series
-
Check Junos OS versionRun 'show version' to obtain the installed Junos OS version and compare it to the affected ranges: <21.4, 21.4, 22.2, 22.3, 22.4, 23.2, 23.4, 24.2Affected if Installed version matches any of the affected versions listed
-
Verify PIM is enabledRun 'show protocols pim' or check the configuration under 'protocols pim' to determine if Protocol Independent Multicast is configured and activeAffected if PIM is enabled and multicast routing is configured
-
Check flowd crash historyRun 'show system crash' or review /var/log/messages for recent flowd process restarts, particularly those correlating with multicast/PIM traffic eventsAffected if flowd has crashed or restarted recently and PIM is in use
Device is affected if it is an SRX4600 or SRX5000 Series running a vulnerable Junos version AND PIM multicast is enabled, making it susceptible to flowd crash from malicious PIM packets.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped21.4
Upgrade Junos OS to the specified patched versions (21.4R3-S9, 22.2R3-S5, 22.3R3-S4, 22.4R3-S4, 23.2R2-S2, 23.4R2, 24.2R1-S1 or 24.2R2). If upgrade is not immediately feasible, consider isolating PIM traffic or restricting logical adjacency.
Upgrade to the latest fixed version in your current branch: 21.4R3-S9+, 22.2R3-S5+, 22.3R3-S4+, 22.4R3-S4+, 23.2R2-S2+, 23.4R2+, or 24.2R2 (for 24.2 branch)
- 1. Identify the current Junos OS version running on the SRX4600 or SRX5000 Series device using 'show version'
- 2. Determine which version branch you are currently on (21.4, 22.2, 22.3, 22.4, 23.2, 23.4, or 24.2)
- 3. Download the appropriate fixed version for your branch from the Juniper Networks support portal: for 21.4 branch use 21.4R3-S9 or later, for 22.2 use 22.2R3-S5 or later, for 22.3 use 22.3R3-S4 or later, for 22.4 use 22.4R3-S4 or later, for 23.2 use 23.2R2-S2 or later, for 23.4 use 23.4R2 or later, for 24.2 use 24.2R1-S1 or 24.2R2
- 4. Upload the Junos OS upgrade package to the device using 'file copy' or similar method
- 5. Install the upgrade using 'request system software add <package-name>' command
- 6. Reboot the device to complete the installation using 'request system reboot'
- 7. After reboot, verify the new version is running with 'show version' and confirm the fix is applied
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,328.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-47503 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-47503 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data