CVE-2024-47504
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAn Improper Validation of Specified Type of Input vulnerability in the packet forwarding engine (pfe) Juniper Networks Junos OS on SRX5000 Series allows an unauthenticated, network based attacker to cause a Denial of Service (Dos). When a non-clustered SRX5000 device receives a specifically malformed packet this will cause a flowd crash and restart. This issue affects Junos OS: * 22.1 releases 22.1R1 and later before 22.2R3-S5, * 22.3 releases before 22.3R3-S4, * 22.4 releases before 22.4R3-S4, * 23.2 releases before 23.2R2-S2, * 23.4 releases before 23.4R2-S1, * 24.2 releases before 24.2R1-S1, 24.2R2. Please note that the PR does indicate that earlier versions have been fixed as well, but these won't be adversely impacted by this.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceImproper input validation in the packet forwarding engine (pfe) of Juniper Networks Junos OS on SRX5000 Series allows an unauthenticated, network-based attacker to send a specifically malformed packet that triggers a flowd crash and restart, resulting in Denial of Service.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 22.1= 22.3= 22.4= 23.2= 23.4= 24.2CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the Junos OS versionExecute 'show version' on the device CLI to retrieve the installed Junos OS release versionAffected if The version matches one of the affected releases: 22.1, 22.3, 22.4, 23.2, 23.4, or 24.2 series versions
-
Confirm the device model is SRX5000 SeriesExecute 'show chassis hardware' or 'show version' to identify the hardware modelAffected if The device is an SRX5000 Series branch (SRX5400, SRX5600, or SRX5800)
-
Check if flowd service has crashedReview system logs with 'show log messages | match flowd' or check for recent flowd process restarts using 'show system processes | match flowd'Affected if flowd has crashed or restarted unexpectedly, or crash logs contain flowd-related errors
-
Inspect PFE (packet forwarding engine) statusExecute 'show pfe statistics error' or 'show pfe hardware' to examine the PFE subsystem healthAffected if The PFE reports errors or the pfe process shows abnormal termination history
A user is affected if their SRX5000 device runs a vulnerable Junos OS version (22.1, 22.3, 22.4, 23.2, 23.4, or 24.2) AND shows evidence of flowd crashes or PFE errors matching the malformed packet signature.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpgrade Junos OS to one of the fixed versions (22.2R3-S5, 22.3R3-S4, 22.4R3-S4, 23.2R2-S2, 23.4R2-S1, or 24.2R1-S1/24.2R2) to remediate this vulnerability. If immediate patching is not possible, consider implementing packet filtering at upstream devices to block potentially malformed traffic.
Upgrade to 22.2R3-S5 / 22.3R3-S4 / 22.4R3-S4 / 23.2R2-S2 or later (whichever corresponds to your current release branch)
- 1. Identify the current Junos OS version running on the SRX5000 Series device using 'show version'
- 2. Based on your current version branch, plan upgrade to the minimum fixed release: for 22.1 branch upgrade to 22.2R3-S5 or later, for 22.3 branch upgrade to 22.3R3-S4 or later, for 22.4 branch upgrade to 22.4R3-S4 or later, for 23.2 branch upgrade to 23.2R2-S2 or later
- 3. Download the appropriate fixed Junos OS release from the Juniper support portal
- 4. Transfer the Junos OS upgrade package to the SRX5000 device
- 5. Initiate the upgrade using 'request system software add <package>' command
- 6. Reboot the device after upgrade completes using 'request system reboot'
- 7. Verify the new version is running with 'show version' and confirm flowd process stability
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,168.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-47504 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-47504 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data