CVE-2024-47520
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA user with advanced report application access rights can perform actions for which they are not authorized
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · low confidenceThis is an authorization bypass vulnerability where users granted 'advanced report application access rights' can perform actions outside their intended permissions. The vulnerability indicates broken access control logic in the reporting application that fails to properly validate user authorization boundaries.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 17.1.1CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- Low
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:L
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Arista Ng Firewall versionAccess the firewall admin console or run 'show version' via CLI to retrieve the installed firmware versionAffected if The displayed version is 17.1.1 or any version lower than 17.1.1
-
Locate the reporting application moduleNavigate to the firewall administrative interface and locate the Reporting or Report Application section under the configuration or services menuAffected if The reporting application module is present and enabled on the firewall
-
Identify users with advanced report access rightsIn the user management or access control section of the admin console, examine the permission assignments for each user account and identify any accounts granted 'advanced report application access rights' or equivalent elevated reporting permissionsAffected if One or more user accounts are assigned advanced report application access rights
-
Verify access control boundaries for reporting actionsAttempt to perform reporting actions (such as generating, exporting, or modifying reports) using a user account that has advanced report application access rights, and observe whether actions can be executed that fall outside the expected scope of that user's roleAffected if Users with advanced report access rights can execute reporting actions that should be restricted to higher permission levels, indicating broken access control logic
A user is affected if they are running Arista Ng Firewall version 17.1.1 or lower AND have the reporting application enabled with users assigned advanced report application access rights, as the access control boundaries can be bypassed.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedImplement and enforce role-based access control (RBAC) checks to ensure users can only execute actions explicitly authorized for their specific permission level. Conduct a comprehensive access control audit across the reporting application.
17.2.x or later fixed release (verify exact version from Arista security advisory)
- 1. Identify the current installed version of Arista Ng Firewall using the system administrative interface or CLI command.
- 2. Consult the Arista security advisory for CVE-2024-47520 on www.arista.com to confirm the specific fixed release version.
- 3. Plan upgrade during a maintenance window following organizational change management procedures.
- 4. Backup the current Ng Firewall configuration before performing the upgrade.
- 5. Upgrade to the fixed release version (verify with Arista advisory - typically 17.2.x or later releases contain security fixes).
- 6. After upgrade, verify the system is operational and test that the authorization controls function correctly.
- 7. Review user access rights in the advanced report application to ensure proper authorization boundaries are enforced.
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation6.0 h
- Implementation12.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $7,680.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-47520 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-47520 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data