CVE-2024-47574
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA authentication bypass using an alternate path or channel in Fortinet FortiClientWindows version 7.4.0, versions 7.2.4 through 7.2.0, versions 7.0.12 through 7.0.0, and 6.4.10 through 6.4.0 allows low privilege attacker to execute arbitrary code with high privilege via spoofed named pipe messages.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceFortiClientWindows contains an authentication bypass vulnerability where low-privilege attackers can send spoofed named pipe messages to bypass authentication mechanisms and execute arbitrary code with high (system) privileges. The vulnerability exists in the named pipe inter-process communication used by FortiClient for privileged operations.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 6.4.0, < 7.0.13>= 7.2.0, < 7.2.5= 7.4.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify FortiClientWindows is installedOpen Programs and Features (appwiz.cpl) or check C:\Program Files\Fortinet\FortiClient\ for the FortiClient application folderAffected if FortiClientWindows is present on the endpoint
-
Determine installed FortiClient versionRight-click FortiClient icon in system tray, select About, or check the version listed in Programs and Features, or inspect the file version of FortiClient.exe in the installation folderAffected if Version cannot be determined or matches the affected ranges below
-
Compare version against affected rangesCheck if the installed version falls into: 6.4.0 through 7.0.12; 7.2.0 through 7.2.4; or exactly 7.4.0Affected if Installed version is within these ranges: >= 6.4.0 and < 7.0.13, OR >= 7.2.0 and < 7.2.5, OR exactly 7.4.0
-
Confirm named pipe IPC is in useFortiClient uses named pipes for privileged operations by default; verify the FortiClient service is running and the endpoint protection features are enabledAffected if FortiClient service is running and the application is active with endpoint protection features enabled
If FortiClientWindows is installed and the version falls within 6.4.0-7.0.12, 7.2.0-7.2.4, or exactly 7.4.0, the environment is affected by this authentication bypass vulnerability.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped7.0.137.2.5
Update FortiClientWindows to vendor-patched versions (7.4.1, 7.2.5, 7.0.13, 6.4.11 or later) across all affected endpoints to remediate the vulnerability.
Upgrade to FortiClient 7.4.1 or later (or 7.2.5+, or 7.0.13+ depending on your major version branch)
- 1. Check the current FortiClient Windows version by opening FortiClient and navigating to Help > About, or by running 'fcwin.exe -v' in the command prompt
- 2. Based on your current major version, upgrade to the corresponding minimum fixed version: 7.0.13 or later, 7.2.5 or later, or 7.4.1 or later
- 3. Download the appropriate FortiClient installer from the official Fortinet support portal (support.fortinet.com) or FortiGuard
- 4. Close any running instances of FortiClient before upgrading
- 5. Run the installer with administrator privileges and follow the on-screen prompts to complete the upgrade
- 6. After installation, verify the version by checking Help > About to confirm the upgrade was successful
- 7. Restart the system if prompted to ensure all components are properly updated
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,560.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-47574 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-47574 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data