Cleartext TransmissionWeakness · CWE-319

CVE-2024-47789

HIGH · 8.7 CVSS v4.0 Published 2024-10-04
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
96/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
** UNSUPPORTED WHEN ASSIGNED ** This vulnerability exists in D3D Security IP Camera D8801 due to usage of weak authentication scheme of the HTTP header protocol where authorization tag contain a Base-64 encoded username and password. A remote attacker could exploit this vulnerability by crafting a HTTP packet leading to exposure of user credentials of the targeted device. NOTE: This vulnerability only affects products that are no longer supported by the maintainer.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

The D3D Security IP Camera D8801 uses HTTP Basic Authentication where credentials are transmitted as Base64-encoded strings in the HTTP Authorization header. Base64 is encoding, not encryption, allowing anyone who intercepts HTTP traffic to easily decode and obtain plaintext username and password credentials.

MitigationSince the device is no longer supported and cannot receive firmware patches, isolate the device on a restricted network segment with no direct internet access, or replace with a currently supported camera model that supports HTTPS and modern authentication.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
Authentication
X
User interaction
None
Scope
X

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify the camera model
    Access the device web interface or check the device label/metadata to confirm the model number is D8801
    Affected if The device model is D3D Security IP Camera D8801
  2. Check if HTTP is enabled for the web interface
    Attempt to access the device using http:// (not https://) - observe whether the device responds over HTTP
    Affected if The device accepts connections over HTTP (port 80)
  3. Verify Basic Authentication is in use
    Inspect HTTP traffic using a packet capture tool (such as Wireshark or tcpdump) when authenticating to the device. Look for the Authorization header containing Base64-encoded credentials
    Affected if The Authorization header contains Base64-encoded username:password strings
  4. Confirm HTTPS is not enabled
    Attempt to access the device using https:// (port 443) or check the device configuration for SSL/TLS settings
    Affected if The device does not support HTTPS, or HTTPS is not configured as the primary access method

You are affected if you are using a D3D Security IP Camera D8801 with HTTP Basic Authentication enabled, where credentials are transmitted as Base64-encoded values in the HTTP Authorization header.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Since the device is no longer supported and cannot receive firmware patches, isolate the device on a restricted network segment with no direct internet access, or replace with a currently supported camera model that supports HTTPS and modern authentication.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation8.0 h
  • Testing4.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
18.0 hours of engineering $3,200
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,120.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-47789 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-47789 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data