CVE-2024-47969
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedImproper resource management in firmware of some Solidigm DC Products may allow an attacker to potentially enable denial of service.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceImproper resource management in the firmware of Solidigm DC Products may allow an attacker to potentially enable denial of service by exhausting or mismanaging system resources through the vulnerable firmware component.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Solidigm DC products in the environmentInventory storage devices to locate Solidigm data center SSDs or storage systems. Use vendor tools, RAID controllers, or system inventory commands (such as 'lspci', 'lsblk', or vendor-specific CLI tools) to enumerate connected storage devices and identify the Solidigm brand and model numbers.Affected if Solidigm DC product (such as Solidigm DC SSDs) is present in the environment
-
Determine the current firmware versionRetrieve the firmware version from the Solidigm device. This can be done via Solidigm's firmware update utility, SMART data output, or by accessing the device through the vendor's management interface or CLI tool. Look for fields labeled firmware version, firmware revision, or similar.Affected if The firmware version cannot be determined or the retrieved version is earlier than the vendor-published fixed version
-
Confirm the vulnerability condition appliesVerify that the device firmware is running and that the device is operational. The improper resource management flaw exists in the firmware itself, so any Solidigm DC product running the affected firmware version is potentially vulnerable, regardless of configuration.Affected if The device is powered on and running an affected firmware version (versions prior to the vendor patch)
-
Assess network exposure of the firmware management interfaceDetermine if the Solidigm device can be accessed remotely through its management or firmware update interface. Check network configuration, accessible IPs, and whether firmware or management tools are reachable over the network.Affected if The device management interface is network-accessible from untrusted segments, increasing the likelihood of remote exploitation
You are affected if you have a Solidigm DC product (SSD or storage device) running firmware versions prior to the vendor's patched release, particularly if the device is network-accessible.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply available firmware updates from Solidigm; until patched, implement network segmentation and access controls to limit exposure to the firmware attack surface.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,880.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-47969 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-47969 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data