CVE-2024-48072
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedWeaver Ecology v9.* was discovered to contain a SQL injection vulnerability via the component /mobilemode/Action.jsp?invoker=com.weaver.formmodel.mobile.mec.servlet.MECAction&action=getFieldTriggerValue&searchField=*&fromTable=HrmResourceManager&whereClause=1%3d1&triggerCondition=1&expression=%3d&fieldValue=1.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceSQL injection vulnerability in Weaver Ecology v9.* allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary SQL commands via the whereClause parameter in /mobilemode/Action.jsp. The vulnerable endpoint passes user-supplied input directly into SQL query construction without proper parameterization or input validation, enabling complete database compromise.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 8.0= 9.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm Weaver Ecology installationLocate the Weaver Ecology application directory or check running web services for Weaverbased deployments. Look for ECOLOGY or Ecology-related process names and application folders.Affected if Weaver Ecology software is present on the system
-
Identify installed versionCheck the application version file, banner, or admin interface for the exact version number. Common locations include version.properties, about page, or HTTP server headers.Affected if Version is 8.0 or 9.0 exactly (or falls within the 8.0-9.0 range if the notation indicates a range)
-
Verify vulnerable endpoint existsCheck if the /mobilemode/Action.jsp endpoint is accessible by attempting a GET request to the path on the Ecology web server.Affected if The /mobilemode/Action.jsp endpoint responds (returns HTTP 200 or other valid response)
-
Inspect parameter handling of whereClauseReview application logs or capture a request to /mobilemode/Action.jsp with a whereClause parameter. Examine whether the parameter value appears directly in SQL query logs or debug output without visible sanitization markers.Affected if The whereClause parameter is accepted and processed without obvious escaping or parameterized handling visible in logs
A system is affected if it runs Weaver Ecology version 8.0 or 9.0, exposes the /mobilemode/Action.jsp endpoint, and accepts the whereClause parameter without input validation.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement parameterized queries or prepared statements for database operations, apply strict input validation on the whereClause and related parameters, and deploy a WAF as a temporary compensating control while the code fix is developed.
- Consultation6.0 h
- Implementation12.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $7,968.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-48072 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-48072 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data