Hard-coded CredentialsWeakness · CWE-798

CVE-2024-48126

CRITICAL · 9.8 CVSS v3.1 Published 2025-01-15
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
100/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
HI-SCAN 6040i Hitrax HX-03-19-I was discovered to contain hardcoded credentials for access to vendor support and service access.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

The HI-SCAN 6040i Hitrax HX-03-19-I baggage X-ray security scanner contains hardcoded credentials embedded in firmware that provide unauthorized access to vendor support and service functions. Attackers with knowledge of these credentials can gain administrative access to the device, potentially compromising security screening operations.

MitigationContact the vendor (Smiths Detection) for patched firmware to replace hardcoded credentials, change any default passwords immediately, restrict network accessibility of the device, and implement monitoring for unauthorized access attempts.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify the device model
    Locate the HI-SCAN 6040i Hitrax baggage X-ray scanner on your network or physical inventory. Check the device label, management interface, or network scan for model identifier 'HI-SCAN 6040i' or 'Hitrax'.
    Affected if The device matches the HI-SCAN 6040i Hitrax model
  2. Determine firmware version
    Access the device management interface or check firmware files. Look for firmware version information in the device settings, web UI, or system logs.
    Affected if Firmware version is installed and cannot be verified as patched by the vendor
  3. Review authentication logs
    Examine the device's authentication and access logs for entries showing login attempts using vendor support or service accounts. Look for any successful or failed authentication from unexpected IP addresses.
    Affected if Logins from support/service accounts are present that were not initiated by your authorized staff
  4. Check for unauthorized network access
    Monitor network traffic to and from the device. Look for connections originating from external or unexpected IP addresses, especially those using protocols associated with vendor support access (telnet, SSH, remote management ports).
    Affected if Connections are observed from IP addresses not belonging to your organization or authorized support channels
  5. Audit administrative accounts
    Review the list of configured user accounts on the device. Check if there are accounts that cannot be modified, deleted, or that appear to be vendor-provided service accounts.
    Affected if Immutable or undisclosed accounts exist that administrators cannot manage or change

You are affected if you have a HI-SCAN 6040i Hitrax device and evidence exists of unauthorized access, unexpected support/service account usage, or connections from unrecognized IP addresses to the device.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Contact the vendor (Smiths Detection) for patched firmware to replace hardcoded credentials, change any default passwords immediately, restrict network accessibility of the device, and implement monitoring for unauthorized access attempts.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation6.0 h
  • Testing3.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
15.0 hours of engineering $2,690
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,304.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-48126 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-48126 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data