CVE-2024-48144
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA prompt injection vulnerability in the chatbox of Fusion Chat Chat AI Assistant Ask Me Anything v1.2.4.0 allows attackers to access and exfiltrate all previous and subsequent chat data between the user and the AI assistant via a crafted message.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceA prompt injection vulnerability exists in the chatbox of Fusion Chat Chat AI Assistant v1.2.4.0, allowing attackers to craft malicious messages that manipulate the AI assistant to access and exfiltrate conversation history. The vulnerability stems from insufficient input sanitization or lack of prompt isolation in the chat interface.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify Fusion Chat Chat AI Assistant versionCheck the application's About page, help menu, or installation directory for the version number. Common locations include Help > About, the installer log, or a version.txt file in the program directory.Affected if The installed version matches v1.2.4.0 exactly, or falls within the 1.2.x branch prior to any security update.
-
Confirm chat interface is accessibleLaunch the application and navigate to the chatbox or chat assistant feature. Verify the chat input field is available for user input.Affected if The chat interface is enabled and accessible to users, as the vulnerability requires interaction with the chatbox.
-
Test for prompt injection susceptibilityEnter a crafted message into the chat input designed to manipulate the AI assistant, such as a request that attempts to access or summarize previous conversation history. Observe whether the assistant complies with instructions that should be outside its normal operation.Affected if The assistant responds to prompts that attempt to access, reveal, or exfiltrate conversation history, indicating insufficient input sanitization.
-
Inspect chat history access controlsReview the application's configuration or settings for chat history storage and whether the AI assistant has direct access to read prior conversations without additional authorization.Affected if Chat history is stored in a manner that allows the AI assistant to access it through user prompts without proper isolation.
A user is affected if they are running Fusion Chat Chat AI Assistant v1.2.4.0 (or an unpatched 1.2.x version) with the chat interface enabled, and the assistant can be manipulated via prompt injection to access conversation history.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement robust input validation and prompt sanitization to treat user input as data rather than instructions, and add output filtering to detect and block attempts to access or exfiltrate chat history.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation16.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $8,960.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-48144 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-48144 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data