CVE-2024-48353
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedYealink Meeting Server before V26.0.0.67 allows attackers to obtain static key information from a front-end JS file and decrypt the plaintext passwords based on the obtained key information.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceYealink Meeting Server versions prior to V26.0.0.67 embed static encryption keys directly in front-end JavaScript files. Attackers can extract these hardcoded keys from the client-side code and use them to decrypt stored password ciphertext, compromising credential confidentiality.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 26.0.0.67CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Determine the installed Yealink Meeting Server versionAccess the admin interface or system information page. Typically found under 'System' > 'About' or 'System' > 'Status'. Alternatively, check the login page source or HTTP headers for version information.Affected if The displayed version is earlier than V26.0.0.67 (e.g., V25.x.x, V24.x.x, etc.)
-
Compare the version against the affected rangeDocument the exact version number found in the previous step. Cross-reference with the vendor's version history or release notes if available.Affected if The version string does not start with 'V26.0.0.67' or higher; specifically any version below V26.0.0.67 indicates exposure to the hardcoded key vulnerability
-
Inspect front-end JavaScript files for hardcoded encryption keysUse browser developer tools or fetch the main JavaScript files served by the Yealink Meeting Server. Search for string patterns resembling encryption keys, such as 'AES', 'DES', 'key', 'secret', 'crypto', or base64-encoded strings of 16-32 bytes.Affected if Hardcoded cryptographic keys, IVs, or secret values are found embedded in the JavaScript code, confirming the vulnerability is present
-
Verify if stored credentials or sensitive data exist in the systemCheck whether user accounts, passwords, or other sensitive credentials are stored within the Yealink Meeting Server environment.Affected if User credentials or sensitive data are stored in the system and the version is below V26.0.0.67, meaning the hardcoded keys could be used to decrypt them
The environment is affected if the installed Yealink Meeting Server version is any release prior to V26.0.0.67, as these versions contain extractable hardcoded encryption keys in client-side JavaScript files that can decrypt stored credentials.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped26.0.0.67
Upgrade Yealink Meeting Server to version V26.0.0.67 or later, which removes hardcoded cryptographic keys and implements proper key management.
V26.0.0.67
- Obtain the Yealink Meeting Server V26.0.0.67 upgrade package from the official Yealink website or authorized distribution channel
- Review the official Yealink upgrade documentation for V26.0.0.67
- Create a complete backup of the current Yealink Meeting Server configuration and all data
- Follow Yealink's documented upgrade procedure to apply V26.0.0.67
- After upgrading, verify the vulnerability is resolved by confirming the static key is no longer exposed in frontend JavaScript files
- Test that the Meeting Server functionality operates normally post-upgrade
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,696.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-48353 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-48353 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data