Purchase Order Management SystemApplication · Oretnom23

CVE-2024-48454

HIGH · 7.2 CVSS v3.1 Published 2024-10-24
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
78/100
Remediation priority · High
Remotely reachable Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
An issue in SourceCodester Purchase Order Management System v1.0 allows a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code via the /admin?page=user component

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

SourceCodester Purchase Order Management System v1.0 contains a remote code execution vulnerability in the /admin?page=user component. An unauthenticated or authenticated remote attacker can exploit this to execute arbitrary code on the underlying server, likely due to improper input validation or insecure handling of user-supplied data in the user management functionality.

MitigationRestrict administrative access to trusted networks or users, implement strict input validation and output encoding on all user management functions, and apply any available vendor patches. If no patch exists, consider disabling the affected component or deploying a WAF rule to block malicious payloads.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Purchase Order Management SystemApplication
Affected:= 1.0

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
High
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Confirm Purchase Order Management System is installed
    Locate the web application files or running service. Common paths may include /var/www/html/, /www/pages/, or check for a service listening on web ports (80, 443, 8080). Look for files or directories related to 'purchase order', 'po', or 'order management'.
    Affected if The application files or service for Purchase Order Management System are found on the system.
  2. Verify the installed version is 1.0
    Check application files for version indicators such as version.php, about.php, or a config/database file that lists the version. Compare against the affected version range.
    Affected if The installed version is exactly 1.0.
  3. Confirm admin interface is accessible
    Attempt to access the admin login page via HTTP/HTTPS request to /admin or index.php?page=login. This is required for the vulnerable component to be reachable.
    Affected if The admin login page returns a 200 OK response and is accessible without authentication or with valid credentials.
  4. Verify user management component is reachable
    Access the vulnerable endpoint by requesting /admin?page=user or /admin/?page=user. This is the specific component where the RCE vulnerability exists.
    Affected if The user management page loads successfully and accepts user input.
  5. Check for input validation on user fields
    If you can access the user management page, inspect the HTML forms and any JavaScript validation. The vulnerability stems from improper input validation, so verify whether user-supplied data in fields (username, name, email) is passed to the server without sanitization.
    Affected if User input fields in the /admin?page=user component do not appear to have proper input validation or sanitization mechanisms.

A system is affected if it runs SourceCodester Purchase Order Management System version 1.0 with the /admin?page=user component accessible and lacking proper input validation on user management fields.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Restrict administrative access to trusted networks or users, implement strict input validation and output encoding on all user management functions, and apply any available vendor patches. If no patch exists, consider disabling the affected component or deploying a WAF rule to block malicious payloads.

Fix this in Purchase Order Management System Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation8.0 h
  • Testing6.0 h
  • Review / QA4.0 h
22.0 hours of engineering $3,860
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-48454 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-48454 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data