Incorrect AuthorizationWeakness · CWE-863

CVE-2024-48540

MEDIUM · 6.2 CVSS v3.1 Published 2024-10-24
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
67/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Incorrect access control in XIAO HE Smart 4.3.1 allows attackers to access sensitive information by analyzing the code and data within the APK file.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

XIAO HE Smart version 4.3.1 Android application contains an incorrect access control vulnerability where sensitive information (such as hardcoded credentials, API keys, or unprotected data) is stored in plaintext within the APK file. Attackers can obtain the APK, decompile it using standard tools, and extract this sensitive data to gain unauthorized access to backend systems or user data.

MitigationRemove all hardcoded credentials, API keys, and sensitive data from the application code; implement proper encryption for any stored secrets; use secure key management solutions; apply code obfuscation to hinder reverse engineering.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Local
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
None
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify if XIAO HE Smart app is installed
    On the Android device, go to Settings > Apps > All Apps and search for 'XIAO HE Smart'. Note the installed version shown in the app details.
    Affected if The app XIAO HE Smart is present on the device and displays version 4.3.1.
  2. Obtain the APK file
    Extract the APK from the device using ADB (adb shell pm path com.xiaohe.smart, then adb pull /data/app/.../base.apk) or use a file manager with root access to locate it in /data/app/
    Affected if You are able to retrieve the APK file for the XIAO HE Smart application.
  3. Inspect APK for plaintext credentials
    Use a decompilation tool such as jadx, apktool, or Androguard to extract and examine the APK contents. Search within the decompiled source code for hardcoded strings such as 'password', 'api_key', 'apikey', 'secret', 'token', 'auth', or similar keywords in configuration files, Java/Kotlin source files, or XML resources.
    Affected if Hardcoded credentials, API keys, tokens, or other sensitive strings are found in plaintext within the APK decompiled code or resources.
  4. Check configuration files for sensitive data
    Within the extracted APK, examine files such as strings.xml, config.xml, assets/, or any .properties/.json files for unencrypted sensitive information including usernames, passwords, API endpoints with authentication parameters, or encryption keys.
    Affected if Plaintext sensitive data including credentials, API keys, or backend access information is present in configuration or resource files.

Your environment is affected if the XIAO HE Smart Android app version 4.3.1 is installed and the APK contains plaintext hardcoded credentials, API keys, or other sensitive data that can be extracted via decompilation.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Remove all hardcoded credentials, API keys, and sensitive data from the application code; implement proper encryption for any stored secrets; use secure key management solutions; apply code obfuscation to hinder reverse engineering.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation12.0 h
  • Testing8.0 h
  • Review / QA4.0 h
28.0 hours of engineering $4,880
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $7,808.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-48540 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-48540 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data