CVE-2024-48789
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAn issue in INATRONIC com.inatronic.drivedeck.home 2.6.23 allows a remote attacker to obtain sensitve information via the firmware update process.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceThe INATRONIC Drivedeck Home mobile application (com.inatronic.drivedeck.home v2.6.23) contains a vulnerability in its firmware update mechanism that allows unauthenticated remote attackers to intercept or access sensitive information during the update process. The vulnerability likely involves the use of insecure communication channels (HTTP), missing authentication, or inadequate encryption in the firmware retrieval and installation process.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the installed application versionLocate the installed version of com.inatronic.drivedeck.home in the device's application settings or package manager. On Android, use Settings > Apps > Drivedeck Home > Version. On iOS, check in App Store or Settings > General > iPhone Storage.Affected if The installed version is v2.6.23 or falls within the same release cycle where the vulnerable firmware update mechanism exists.
-
Verify if firmware update functionality is enabledNavigate to the Drivedeck Home application settings and inspect whether the firmware update or device firmware sync feature is turned on or configured.Affected if The firmware update feature is enabled and configured to communicate with update servers.
-
Inspect network communication configurationUse a network traffic analysis tool (such as a proxy or packet capture) to observe the network requests made when the firmware update feature is triggered. Check if the traffic uses HTTP instead of HTTPS.Affected if The app sends firmware update requests over unencrypted HTTP channels or fails to validate TLS certificates.
-
Check for authentication requirements in update processExamine the application's network requests during firmware updates to determine if authentication tokens, API keys, or signed requests are required and validated by the server.Affected if The firmware update endpoint accepts requests without requiring valid authentication credentials.
A user is affected if they have version v2.6.23 of Drivedeck Home installed with the firmware update feature enabled and the app uses unencrypted or unauthenticated channels for retrieving firmware updates.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement TLS/SSL encryption for all firmware update communications, add proper authentication and authorization checks, and implement cryptographic signature verification for firmware binaries before installation.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation16.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $8,960.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-48789 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-48789 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data