CVE-2024-48798
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAn issue in Hubble Connected (com.hubbleconnected.vervelife) 2.00.81 allows a remote attacker to obtain sensitive information via the firmware update process.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceThe Hubble Connected VerveLife mobile app version 2.00.81 contains a vulnerability in its firmware update mechanism that allows unauthenticated remote attackers to intercept or access sensitive information during the update process. This likely stems from improper authentication or lack of encryption in the communication channel used for fetching and applying firmware updates.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify if VerveLife app is installedCheck device application list or package manager for 'Hubble Connected' or 'VerveLife' applicationAffected if Application is present on the device
-
Determine installed app versionAccess device settings, navigate to app info for VerveLife, and view the version number under 'App version' or 'Version name'Affected if Version is 2.00.81 or lower
-
Check for firmware update configurationOpen the app settings or preferences panel and look for 'Firmware Update', 'Device Update', or 'Check for Updates' options within the app or paired device settingsAffected if Firmware update feature is accessible or enabled in the app
-
Inspect update traffic if possibleIf testing in a controlled environment, use a network proxy or packet capture tool to observe communications when the update feature is triggered; look for HTTP instead of HTTPS or lack of authentication tokensAffected if Update requests are sent over unencrypted channels without authentication headers
If the VerveLife app version is 2.00.81 or lower and the firmware update feature is used, the environment is likely affected by this vulnerability.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataThe vendor should implement proper authentication and TLS encryption for all firmware update communications, verify update integrity via cryptographic signatures, and push a patched version to users. Until patched, users should avoid using the app on untrusted networks.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation16.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $8,960.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-48798 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-48798 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data