CVE-2024-48936
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedSchedMD Slurm before 24.05.4 has Incorrect Authorization. A mistake in authentication handling in stepmgr could permit an attacker to execute processes under other users' jobs. This is limited to jobs explicitly running with --stepmgr, or on systems that have globally enabled stepmgr via SlurmctldParameters=enable_stepmgr in their configuration.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceSlurm's stepmgr component has an authentication handling flaw that allows privilege escalation, enabling an attacker to execute processes under other users' job contexts. This only affects systems where stepmgr is explicitly enabled via --stepmgr flag or globally via SlurmctldParameters=enable_stepmgr.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 24.05.4CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- High
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- Low
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check if stepmgr is enabled globally in slurmctldSearch the slurmctld configuration files (typically /etc/slurm/slurm.conf or /etc/slurm/slurmctld.conf) for the directive 'SlurmctldParameters=enable_stepmgr'Affected if The directive 'SlurmctldParameters=enable_stepmgr' is present in the configuration
-
Check for stepmgr in job scriptsSearch job submission scripts and job definitions for the --stepmgr flag being passed to sbatch or srun commandsAffected if Any job scripts contain the --stepmgr flag
-
Identify installed Slurm versionRun 'slurmctld -V' or 'scontrol version' to retrieve the installed Slurm version numberAffected if The installed version is less than 24.05.4 (for example, 24.05.3, 24.05.0, 23.x.x, etc.)
-
Verify stepmgr daemon is runningCheck running processes for slurmstepd or verify if stepmgr service is active using 'systemctl status slurmstepd' or 'ps aux | grep stepmgr'Affected if The slurmstepd daemon is actively running on the system
A system is affected only if both stepmgr is enabled (via --stepmgr flag or SlurmctldParameters=enable_stepmgr) AND the installed Slurm version is below 24.05.4.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped24.05.4
Upgrade to Slurm 24.05.4 or later to receive the fix. Alternatively, if upgrading is not feasible, disable stepmgr by removing --stepmgr from job scripts and removing enable_stepmgr from slurmctld configuration.
24.05.4
- 1. Identify your current Slurm version by running `slurmctld -V` or checking the installed RPM/DEB package.
- 2. Determine if stepmgr is enabled on your system: grep for 'SlurmctldParameters=enable_stepmgr' in slurm.conf, or check if any jobs use the --stepmgr flag.
- 3. Review the Slurm 24.05.4 release notes at www.schedmd.com for any configuration changes or migration requirements relevant to your setup.
- 4. Create a backup of your current Slurm configuration files (slurm.conf, cgroup.conf, etc.) and database if using slurmdbd.
- 5. Upgrade Slurm packages to version 24.05.4 using your distribution's package manager (e.g., `apt-get upgrade` or `yum update` for RHEL-based systems).
- 6. After upgrading, restart Slurm services in the correct order: first slurmctld, then slurmd on all compute nodes.
- 7. Verify the upgrade was successful by running `slurmctld -V` to confirm version 24.05.4.
- 8. If you had jobs using --stepmgr or had enable_stepmgr configured, verify stepmgr functionality works correctly with a test job.
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation3.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,272.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-48936 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-48936 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data