CVE-2024-48938
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedZnuny before LTS 6.5.1 through 6.5.10 and 7.0.1 through 7.0.16 allows DoS/ReDos via email. Parsing the content of emails where HTML code is copied from Microsoft Word could lead to high CPU usage and block the parsing process.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceZnuny LTS before 6.5.1/7.0.16 contains a ReDoS vulnerability in its email parsing component. When parsing emails containing HTML code copied from Microsoft Word, certain regex patterns used in the parser can cause excessive CPU consumption due to catastrophic backtracking, leading to denial of service.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 6.0.0, < 6.1.0>= 6.5.1, <= 6.5.10>= 7.0.1, <= 7.0.16CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify Znuny is installedCheck for Znuny help desk software in your environment. Look for Znuny-related processes, web application files, or the product in your software inventory.Affected if Znuny is not present in the environment.
-
Determine installed Znuny versionLocate the Znuny version information. This is typically accessible via the Znuny admin interface (Admin > System Administration > System Information), or check version files in the Znuny installation directory.Affected if Unable to retrieve version information.
-
Compare version to affected rangesIf you have version 6.0.x, 6.5.1-6.5.10, or 7.0.1-7.0.16, you are in an affected range. Also flag if version is less than 6.1.0 (6.0.x versions).Affected if Version matches: 6.0.x, 6.5.1-6.5.10, or 7.0.1-7.0.16.
-
Confirm email processing is enabledVerify that the Znuny email parsing feature is active. Check if incoming email tickets or email notifications are configured in your Znuny system (PostMaster Master::PostMasterFilter or similar email handling modules).Affected if Email parsing component is not configured or in use.
-
Identify CPU consumption patternsMonitor CPU usage on the server hosting Znuny, particularly during email processing operations. Look for unusual spikes when processing emails with HTML content copied from Microsoft Word.Affected if High CPU usage occurs specifically when processing Word-originated HTML emails.
You are affected if Znuny is installed with a version in 6.0.x, 6.5.1-6.5.10, or 7.0.1-7.0.16 AND the email parsing feature is enabled and processing incoming emails.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped6.1.0
Upgrade Znuny to LTS 6.5.11+ or 7.0.17+ to receive the patch. If immediate upgrade is not feasible, consider rate-limiting or queuing email processing to mitigate CPU exhaustion attacks.
Znuny 6.5.11 or later for 6.x branch; Znuny 7.0.17 or later for 7.x branch
- 1. Identify the currently installed Znuny version using the admin interface or system package manager
- 2. For Znuny 6.x branch: Upgrade to version 6.5.11 or later
- 3. For Znuny 7.x branch: Upgrade to version 7.0.17 or later
- 4. Verify the upgrade was successful by checking the system version
- 5. Test email parsing functionality with HTML content to confirm the ReDoS vulnerability is remediated
- 6. Monitor system performance during email processing to ensure normal CPU usage
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,960.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-48938 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-48938 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data