CVE-2024-48942
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe Syracom Secure Login (2FA) plugin for Jira, Confluence, and Bitbucket through 3.1.4.5 allows remote attackers to easily brute-force the 2FA PIN via the plugins/servlet/twofactor/public/pinvalidation endpoint. The last 30 and the next 30 tokens are valid.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe Syracom Secure Login 2FA plugin for Jira, Confluence, and Bitbucket versions through 3.1.4.5 contains a weak token validation flaw. The /plugins/servlet/twofactor/public/pinvalidation endpoint accepts not just the current valid token but also the previous 30 and next 30 tokens, effectively providing a 60-token window that all authenticate successfully. This makes brute-force attacks trivial since an attacker has a 1-in-1000 chance (rather than 1-in-1,000,000) of guessing a valid 6-digit PIN.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 3.1.4.5CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- High
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify Syracom Secure Login plugin is installedAccess Atlassian administration console (Manage apps or Apps > Find new apps) and search for 'Syracom Secure Login' or 'Secure Login 2FA' in the installed plugins listAffected if The plugin appears in the installed applications list
-
Check installed plugin versionIn the Atlassian admin console, click on the Syracom Secure Login plugin details to view the version number; compare against 3.1.4.5 (any version equal to or lower than 3.1.4.5 is affected)Affected if Version displayed is 3.1.4.5 or earlier
-
Confirm the vulnerable endpoint exists and respondsSend a POST request to /plugins/servlet/twofactor/public/pinvalidation with a test PIN payload (e.g., {"pin":"000000"}); check if the endpoint accepts the request and returns an authentication responseAffected if The endpoint responds to PIN validation requests
-
Verify 2FA is enabled for usersCheck the plugin configuration in Atlassian administration under Secure Login settings, or review user security settings to confirm two-factor authentication is active for the Jira/Confluence/Bitbucket instanceAffected if 2FA/Secure Login is enabled and enforced for users in the environment
-
Audit authentication logs for brute-force patternsReview Atlassian access logs or security audit logs for repeated requests to /plugins/servlet/twofactor/public/pinvalidation with varying PIN values from the same IP or session; look for success rate anomaliesAffected if Logs show high-volume PIN attempts or multiple successful authentications in short succession from the same source
Your environment is affected if the Syracom Secure Login plugin version is 3.1.4.5 or earlier AND the 2FA feature is enabled, making the /plugins/servlet/twofactor/public/pinvalidation endpoint vulnerable to trivial brute-force attacks.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpgrade to the patched version of the Syracom Secure Login plugin (contact vendor for fixed release). As an interim control, implement aggressive rate limiting or IP-based blocking on the pinvalidation endpoint, and monitor for authentication anomalies.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,128.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-48942 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-48942 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data