CVE-2024-49085
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedWindows Routing and Remote Access Service (RRAS) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceThis is a remote code execution vulnerability in Windows Routing and Remote Access Service (RRAS), a core Windows Server component that handles routing and VPN capabilities. The high CVSS score (8.8) indicates that an attacker can potentially execute arbitrary code on affected systems without authentication in some scenarios.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE dataall versions= r2all versions= r2< 10.0.14393.7606< 10.0.17763.6659< 10.0.20348.2966< 10.0.25398.1308< 10.0.26100.2605CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check Windows Server version and build numberRun 'winver' or 'systeminfo' from command prompt to obtain the exact Windows build version (for example, 10.0.17763.x). Compare your build number against the affected ranges: Server 2016 < 10.0.14393.7606, Server 2019 < 10.0.17763.6659, Server 2022 < 10.0.20348.2966, Server 2022 23h2 < 10.0.25398.1308, Server 2025 < 10.0.26100.2605. Server 2008/2012/2012 R2 are all affected regardless of build.Affected if Your Windows Server version falls within any of the vulnerable version ranges listed, or you are running Server 2008/2012/2012 R2.
-
Verify if RRAS service is installedOpen Services console (services.msc) or run 'Get-Service RemoteAccess' in PowerShell. Look for the service named 'Remote Access (RRAS)' or 'Routing and Remote Access'.Affected if The RRAS service is present on the system.
-
Confirm if RRAS is enabled or runningIn Services console, check the service status. In PowerShell, run 'Get-Service RemoteAccess | Select-Object Name,Status,StartType' to see if Status is Running or StartType is not Disabled.Affected if The RRAS service is started, running, or configured to start automatically (StartType is not Disabled).
You are affected if your Windows Server version is within the vulnerable build ranges AND the RRAS feature is installed and enabled on your system.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped10.0.14393.760610.0.17763.665910.0.20348.2966
Apply the Microsoft security update for CVE-2024-49085 immediately, prioritizing Windows Server systems with RRAS enabled, and verify that remote access policies are properly restricted.
Windows Server 2016 to build 10.0.14393.7606+ | Windows Server 2019 to build 10.0.17763.6659+ | Windows Server 2022 to build 10.0.20348.2966+ | Windows Server 2022 23h2 to build 10.0.25398.1308+ | Windows Server 2025 to build 10.0.26100.2605+
- 1. Apply the November 2024 (or later) Windows security update through Windows Update, Microsoft Update, or your internal update management system
- 2. For Windows Server 2016: Update to build 10.0.14393.7606 or later
- 3. For Windows Server 2019: Update to build 10.0.17763.6659 or later
- 4. For Windows Server 2022: Update to build 10.0.20348.2966 or later
- 5. For Windows Server 2022 23h2: Update to build 10.0.25398.1308 or later
- 6. For Windows Server 2025: Update to build 10.0.26100.2605 or later
- 7. After updating, verify the RRAS service is running correctly and test remote access functionality
- 8. Note: Windows Server 2008 and Windows Server 2012 (all versions) are end-of-life and receive no security updates; migrate to a supported Windows Server version
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-49085 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-49085 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data