CVE-2024-49318
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedDeserialization of Untrusted Data vulnerability in Scott My Reading Library my-reading-library allows Object Injection.This issue affects My Reading Library: from n/a through <= 1.0.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceThe My Reading Library application contains a PHP Object Injection vulnerability where unserialize() is called on untrusted user-controlled data, potentially allowing remote code execution through the instantiation of malicious objects with magic methods like __wakeup() or __destruct().
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the installed version of My Reading LibraryCheck the application source code for a version file, or look in configuration files, composer.json, or a README for a version number. Common locations include: /version.php, /config.php, composer.json 'version' field, or a changelog file.Affected if The installed version cannot be determined or is unknown/unpatched.
-
Locate unserialize() calls in the application codeSearch the codebase for 'unserialize(' using grep or a similar tool. Example: grep -r "unserialize(" /path/to/application/ --include="*.php"Affected if Any unserialize() call exists in PHP files within the application directory.
-
Determine if user input reaches unserialize()Analyze the code paths from where unserialize() is called backwards to identify if $_GET, $_POST, $_COOKIE, or other user-supplied data flows to it. Check the function/class containing unserialize() to see its input sources.Affected if User-controlled data (from request parameters, cookies, or headers) is passed directly to unserialize() without sanitization.
-
Verify if authentication is required to reach the vulnerable codeReview the code around the unserialize() call to determine if it is within a function or file that executes after a login check, session validation, or other access control.Affected if The vulnerable unserialize() call is reachable without any authentication or authorization check.
-
Identify magic method classes that could be exploitedSearch for PHP class definitions containing __wakeup(), __destruct(), __toString(), or __get() magic methods in the application or included libraries. Example: grep -r "function __wakeup" --include="*.php"Affected if Magic method classes exist in the application and are autoloadable, making RCE possible if unserialize() is exploitable.
-
Check PHP configuration for deserialization restrictionsReview php.ini for the unserialize() options. The setting 'unserialize_callback_func' specifies a callback, and 'allow_url_fopen'/'allow_url_include' affect related attacks. Check: ini_get('unserialize_callback_func')Affected if PHP configuration does not block or warn on dangerous unserialize() operations.
A user is affected if the My Reading Library application contains any unserialize() call that processes untrusted user input without prior validation, and that code path is reachable in the application.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataReplace all unserialize() calls with json_decode() or another safe deserialization method, and implement proper input validation and authentication on data entry points.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-49318 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-49318 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data