CVE-2024-49504
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedgrub2 allowed attackers with access to the grub shell to access files on the encrypted disks.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidencegrub2 contains a vulnerability that allows an attacker with physical access to the grub shell (accessible during boot) to bypass disk encryption protections and read files from encrypted disks without needing the encryption passphrase.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Physical
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- Authentication
- X
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- X
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify grub2 installation and versionRun 'rpm -q grub2' or 'dpkg -l | grep grub2' depending on your Linux distribution. For source-based systems, check /boot/grub2 or /boot/grub directory contents.Affected if grub2 is installed and the version falls within the affected range (compare to vendor security advisories for CVE-2024-49504).
-
Check for encrypted disk configurationsRun 'cryptsetup luksDump /dev/sdX' or check /etc/crypttab for LUKS-encrypted partitions. Also inspect /boot for encrypted volumes.Affected if Encrypted partitions (LUKS, dm-crypt) are present and configured to unlock via grub.
-
Verify grub can access disks without authenticationDuring boot, attempt to access the grub command line (press ESC or hold Shift at boot). Check if 'ls' or 'cryptomount' commands can enumerate or access encrypted volumes without entering a passphrase.Affected if grub shell permits reading from encrypted disks or executing 'cryptomount' without requiring passphrase authentication.
-
Check for authenticated grub encryption moduleInspect /boot/grub2/i386-pc/ or /boot/grub/x86_64-efi/ for the 'cryptodisk' module. Examine grub.cfg for 'cryptomount' usage and whether authentication is enforced.Affected if The cryptodisk module is loaded but does not enforce passphrase verification before accessing encrypted volumes.
A system is affected if it runs a vulnerable grub2 version with encrypted disk configurations accessible through the grub shell without passphrase verification.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply the grub2 security update when available. Limit physical access to systems and consider additional security controls such as TPM-based full-disk encryption with measured boot to prevent unauthorized grub shell access.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,224.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-49504 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-49504 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data