CVE-2024-4956
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedPath Traversal in Sonatype Nexus Repository 3 allows an unauthenticated attacker to read system files. Fixed in version 3.68.1.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidencePath traversal vulnerability in Sonatype Nexus Repository 3 allows unauthenticated remote attackers to access arbitrary files on the host system by manipulating path parameters, potentially exposing sensitive system files and configuration data.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify if Nexus Repository 3 is installedCheck for running Nexus processes or installed directories. On Linux, look for 'nexus' processes via 'ps aux | grep nexus' or check common installation paths like /opt/nexus or /opt/sonatype-work. On Windows, check services named 'Nexus' or installation under C:\Program Files\Sonatype.Affected if No Nexus Repository 3 process or installation found means not affected by this CVE.
-
Determine the installed Nexus versionLog into the Nexus administration web interface and navigate to the 'System' > 'Information' page to view the version number. Alternatively, check the 'nexus-default.properties' or 'VERSION' file in the installation directory.Affected if Unable to determine version means further investigation is required.
-
Compare installed version to fixed releaseCompare the identified version against 3.68.1. Any version below 3.68.1 (including 3.67.x, 3.66.x, 3.65.x and earlier) is vulnerable.Affected if Version is 3.68.0 or earlier indicates the instance is vulnerable to path traversal.
-
Assess network exposure of the Nexus interfaceDetermine if the Nexus web interface is accessible from untrusted networks. Check firewall rules, reverse proxy configurations, or cloud security groups allowing direct access to port 8081 (default HTTP) or 8443 (default HTTPS) from the internet or untrusted zones.Affected if Nexus interface is externally accessible without authentication means the path traversal can be exploited remotely.
-
Review access logs for path traversal patternsExamine Nexus application logs (typically in /opt/sonatype-work/nexus3/log or similar) for suspicious requests containing '../' sequences, especially to system paths like '/etc/', '/opt/', or 'C:\Windows\'. Look for requests to files outside the repository storage directories.Affected if Log entries show successful unauthorized file access attempts via path traversal indicates potential exploitation.
A user is affected if their Nexus Repository 3 installation is version 3.68.0 or earlier AND the web interface is network-accessible to untrusted users.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpgrade Nexus Repository 3 to version 3.68.1 or later. If immediate upgrade is not feasible, restrict network access to the Nexus interface and implement web application firewall rules to detect and block path traversal patterns.
Nexus Repository 3 version 3.68.1 or later
- Back up your current Nexus Repository 3 installation, configuration, and data directories
- Stop the Nexus Repository 3 service
- Download Nexus Repository 3 version 3.68.1 or later from the official Sonatype repository (https://help.sonatype.com/en/download.html)
- Install the upgrade following Sonatype's standard upgrade documentation for Nexus Repository 3
- Start the Nexus Repository 3 service
- Verify the upgrade was successful by checking the version in the UI (Administration > System > Logging) or via the API endpoint /service/rest/v1/status
- Confirm the path traversal vulnerability (CVE-2024-4956) is no longer present
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,560.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-4956 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-4956 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data