CVE-2024-49683
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedMissing Authorization vulnerability in Magazine3 Schema & Structured Data for WP & AMP schema-and-structured-data-for-wp allows Accessing Functionality Not Properly Constrained by ACLs.This issue affects Schema & Structured Data for WP & AMP: from n/a through <= 1.3.5.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceMissing Authorization vulnerability in the Magazine3 Schema & Structured Data for WP & AMP plugin allows attackers to access functionality that should be restricted by access control lists. The specific vulnerable endpoints or functions are not detailed in available sources, but the issue enables unauthorized access to privileged operations.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify the plugin is installedNavigate to WordPress admin dashboard > Plugins and look for 'Schema & Structured Data for WP & AMP' by Magazine3, or check the filesystem at wp-content/plugins/schema-wp-structured-data-for-wp-and-amp/ for the plugin folderAffected if plugin folder exists in the WordPress installation
-
Identify the installed versionIn WordPress admin > Plugins > Schema & Structured Data for WP & AMP, click on the plugin name to view details and read the version number, or inspect the main plugin file header in schema-wp-structured-data-for-wp-and-amp/schema-wp-structured-data-for-wp-and-amp.phpAffected if version displayed is 1.3.5 or lower
-
Check for the vulnerability conditionCompare your installed version against the affected range: versions 1.3.5 and below are vulnerable; versions 1.3.6 and above contain the fixAffected if installed version is 1.3.5 or any version below 1.3.5
You are affected if the Magazine3 Schema plugin is installed and the version number is 1.3.5 or lower, since the missing authorization flaw exists in those versions.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpdate the plugin to a version beyond 1.3.5 that includes proper authorization checks, or if no update is available, restrict access to sensitive functionality via server-side configuration or disable the plugin until a fix is released.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,984.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-49683 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-49683 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data