CVE-2024-49747
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIn gatts_process_read_by_type_req of gatt_sr.cc, there is a possible out of bounds write due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to remote code execution with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA logic error in the GATT server's read-by-type request handler (gatts_process_read_by_type_req in gatt_sr.cc) causes an out-of-bounds write vulnerability. This buffer overflow in the Bluetooth stack can be exploited remotely without authentication or user interaction, allowing arbitrary code execution.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 12.0= 12.1= 13.0= 14.0= 15.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check Android versionGo to Settings > About Phone > Android version, or run 'getprop ro.build.version.release' via ADB shellAffected if The installed version matches 12.0, 12.1, 13.0, 14.0, or 15.0
-
Verify Bluetooth is enabledCheck Settings > Bluetooth, or run 'settings get global bluetooth_on' via ADB shell (returns 1 if enabled)Affected if Bluetooth is turned on and the Android version is in the affected list
-
Confirm GATT server usageInspect running processes for apps that advertise Bluetooth services using GATT, or monitor with 'adb shell dumpsys bluetooth_manager' to identify active GATT server connectionsAffected if Any application is acting as a GATT server (Bluetooth peripheral mode) while running an affected Android version
A device is affected if it runs Android 12.0, 12.1, 13.0, 14.0, or 15.0 with Bluetooth enabled and actively using GATT server functionality.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedApply vendor patches for the affected Bluetooth stack implementation. Until a patch is available, consider restricting Bluetooth access to trusted devices and networks to reduce attack surface.
Latest Android security update containing the January 2025 security patch level (or subsequent updates)
- 1. Navigate to Settings > System > Software Update (or Settings > About Phone > System Update) on the affected Android device
- 2. Check for and install any available system updates
- 3. Ensure the device receives the latest Android security patch level
- 4. For enterprise or non-Pixel devices, verify with the device manufacturer that the Bluetooth security update has been applied
- 5. If no update is available from the manufacturer, consider migrating to a device with active security support
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,248.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-49747 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-49747 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data