CVE-2024-49792
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIBM ApplinX 11.1 is vulnerable to cross-site scripting. This vulnerability allows an authenticated user to embed arbitrary JavaScript code in the Web UI thus altering the intended functionality potentially leading to credentials disclosure within a trusted session.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceIBM ApplinX 11.1 contains a stored cross-site scripting vulnerability in its Web UI. An authenticated attacker can embed malicious JavaScript code into the Web interface, which executes in the browsers of other users viewing the affected content, potentially exposing session credentials or performing actions on behalf of victims within trusted sessions.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 11.1.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm IBM ApplinX versionLocate the IBM ApplinX installation and retrieve its version number using the product's built-in version command or check the installation directory for version metadata. Common methods include running 'applinx -version' or checking version files in the installation path.Affected if The installed version is exactly 11.1.0 (only this specific version is listed as affected).
-
Verify Web UI component is enabledCheck the IBM ApplinX configuration to determine if the Web UI interface is currently active. This is typically found in the product's admin console, configuration files, or service settings.Affected if The Web UI is enabled and accessible to users - the vulnerability exists in this component.
-
Identify authenticated user access to Web UIReview user authentication settings and session management configuration for the Web UI. Determine which authenticated users have access to create or modify content displayed in the interface.Affected if Authenticated users can access the Web UI - the CVE requires an authenticated attacker to inject the malicious script.
-
Inspect Web UI input fields for XSS vectorsExamine the Web UI for user-input fields where content can be submitted and stored (such as configuration fields, user profiles, or data entry forms). These are potential injection points for stored XSS.Affected if The Web UI contains fields that accept and store user-supplied data without proper validation - this is the attack surface.
-
Review web server logs for script injection patternsAnalyze IBM ApplinX web server logs and application logs for patterns indicating JavaScript tags or script payloads embedded in Web UI requests. Look for common XSS signatures in submitted data.Affected if Log analysis reveals script injection attempts or stored XSS payloads in Web UI data fields.
A user is affected if running IBM ApplinX version 11.1.0 with the Web UI enabled and accessible to authenticated users, as the stored XSS vulnerability resides in the Web UI component.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedImplement robust input validation and output encoding for all user-supplied data in the Web UI. Deploy Content Security Policy (CSP) headers to mitigate XSS execution. Apply vendor patches when available.
IBM ApplinX 11.1.1 or later (latest 11.1.x maintenance release)
- 1. Review IBM's official security bulletin for CVE-2024-49792 at www.ibm.com for complete remediation details
- 2. Determine the current installed IBM ApplinX version by navigating to the ApplinX Administration console
- 3. Download and install the latest IBM ApplinX 11.1.x maintenance release or subsequent version that includes the security fix
- 4. After installation, clear browser cache and test the Web UI to confirm the fix is applied
- 5. Verify the fix does not introduce regressions in existing ApplinX applications
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation16.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $8,960.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-49792 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-49792 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data