CVE-2024-49807
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIBM Sterling B2B Integrator 6.0.0.0 through 6.1.2.5 and 6.2.0.0 through 6.2.0.3 Standard Edition is vulnerable to stored cross-site scripting. This vulnerability allows authenticated users to embed arbitrary JavaScript code in the Web UI thus altering the intended functionality potentially leading to credentials disclosure within a trusted session.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceIBM Sterling B2B Integrator versions 6.0.0.0 through 6.1.2.5 and 6.2.0.0 through 6.2.0.3 Standard Edition contains a stored cross-site scripting vulnerability in its Web UI. Authenticated users can embed arbitrary JavaScript code that gets stored and executed in the browsers of other users viewing the affected interface, potentially leading to credentials disclosure within trusted sessions.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 6.0.0.0, <= 6.1.2.5>= 6.2.0.0, <= 6.2.0.3CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed IBM Sterling B2B Integrator versionCheck the product version via the admin console or by inspecting version files in the installation directory. Common paths include $SBI_HOME/version.txt or the About section in the Sterling B2B Integrator dashboard.Affected if The installed version falls within 6.0.0.0 through 6.1.2.5 OR 6.2.0.0 through 6.2.0.3.
-
Confirm Web UI is accessibleVerify that the Sterling B2B Integrator web interface (typically accessed via HTTP/HTTPS on port 8443 or 443) is enabled and reachable. Check the application server configuration for the web UI component.Affected if The web interface is enabled and accessible to users.
-
Verify user authentication is enabled for the web interfaceCheck that user authentication is configured for the web UI. Examine the user management settings in the Sterling B2B Integrator admin console to confirm non-anonymous access.Affected if Authenticated users can access the web UI and submit content through user-facing fields.
-
Identify user-submittable fields in the web interfaceReview the web UI forms and input fields where authenticated users can enter data that gets stored and displayed to other users. Common areas include document naming, custom fields, and metadata inputs.Affected if User-submittable fields exist in the web UI where data is stored and rendered to other users.
If the installed version is within 6.0.0.0-6.1.2.5 or 6.2.0.0-6.2.0.3 and the web UI with authenticated user input is accessible, the environment is potentially affected by this stored XSS vulnerability.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedImplement context-aware output encoding and input validation for all user-supplied fields in the Web UI; consider deploying Content Security Policy headers to mitigate XSS execution.
IBM Sterling B2B Integrator 6.2.0.4 or later (when available)
- 1. Check IBM's official support portal (www.ibm.com/support) for the specific security patch for CVE-2024-49807
- 2. Apply the IBM interim fix (APAR) corresponding to this vulnerability
- 3. After patching, verify the fix by testing that the XSS payload is no longer executable in the affected Web UI fields
- 4. Clear browser caches and test with a new session to confirm remediation
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation6.0 h
- Implementation12.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $8,448.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-49807 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-49807 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data