CVE-2024-50306
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedUnchecked return value can allow Apache Traffic Server to retain privileges on startup. This issue affects Apache Traffic Server: from 9.2.0 through 9.2.5, from 10.0.0 through 10.0.1. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 9.2.6 or 10.0.2, which fixes the issue.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceAn unchecked return value during Apache Traffic Server startup prevents proper privilege dropping, allowing the service to retain elevated privileges when it should release them. This could enable privilege escalation or broader system access than intended.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 9.0.0, < 9.2.6>= 10.0.0, < 10.0.2CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Apache Traffic Server versionRun 'traffic_server --version' or 'traffic_ctl server version' from the command line to retrieve the installed version numberAffected if The version output falls within 9.0.0 through 9.2.5, or 10.0.0 through 10.0.1 (the vulnerable ranges)
-
Check binary package version via package managerOn Red Hat/CentOS systems: 'rpm -qa | grep traffic'; on Debian/Ubuntu: 'dpkg -l | grep traffic'; on systems using 'pkg' utility: 'pkg info ats'Affected if The installed package version matches the affected ranges listed above
-
Verify if privilege dropping is configuredExamine the traffic_server configuration for user/group settings: look for 'proxy.config.http.user' or 'run_as_user' directives in records.config or traffic_server.yaml, and confirm the service is configured to start as root and drop privilegesAffected if The configuration shows the service starts as root and attempts to drop to an unprivileged user, which triggers the vulnerable code path at startup
-
Check for startup logs indicating privilege handlingReview Apache Traffic Server startup logs (typically in /var/log/traffic-server/ or journalctl output) for messages related to 'setuid', 'setgid', or privilege operationsAffected if Logs show successful or failed privilege transitions but no error is raised about the unchecked return value issue
-
Verify binary build date or patch statusUse 'traffic_server -V' or inspect the binary with 'file $(which traffic_server)' and check build timestamps; source code inspection would show if the fix for the unchecked return value in privilege dropping is presentAffected if The binary predates the patched versions (9.2.6 or 10.0.2) and lacks the proper error checking code
A system is affected if it runs Apache Traffic Server version 9.0.0-9.2.5 or 10.0.0-10.0.1 and is configured to drop privileges from root to an unprivileged user at startup.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped9.2.610.0.2
Upgrade to Apache Traffic Server version 9.2.6 or 10.0.2 to obtain the patched binary, or apply the vendor patch which adds proper error checking for the privilege-dropping function.
Apache Traffic Server 9.2.6 or 10.0.2 (depending on your major version branch)
- 1. Identify your current Apache Traffic Server version using 'traffic_server -V' or your package manager
- 2. If running 9.0.0 - 9.2.5, plan upgrade to version 9.2.6
- 3. If running 10.0.0 - 10.0.1, plan upgrade to version 10.0.2
- 4. Back up your current Traffic Server configuration (records.config, remap.config, and any custom plugins)
- 5. Stop the Traffic Server service
- 6. Upgrade using your package manager (apt-get, yum, or from source) to the appropriate fixed version
- 7. Start the Traffic Server service
- 8. Verify the new version is running with 'traffic_server -V'
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation1.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,464.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-50306 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-50306 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data