CVE-2024-50335
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedSuiteCRM is an open-source, enterprise-ready Customer Relationship Management (CRM) software application. The "Publish Key" field in SuiteCRM's Edit Profile page is vulnerable to Reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS), allowing an attacker to inject malicious JavaScript code. This can be exploited to steal CSRF tokens and perform unauthorized actions, such as creating new administrative users without proper authentication. The vulnerability arises due to insufficient input validation and sanitization of the Publish Key field within the SuiteCRM application. When an attacker injects a malicious script, it gets executed within the context of an authenticated user's session. The injected script (o.js) then leverages the captured CSRF token to forge requests that create new administrative users, effectively compromising the integrity and security of the CRM instance. This issue has been addressed in versions 7.14.6 and 8.7.1. Users are advised to upgrade. There are no known workarounds for this vulnerability.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceSuiteCRM contains a reflected XSS vulnerability in the 'Publish Key' field of the Edit Profile page. An attacker can inject malicious JavaScript that executes in authenticated users' sessions, allowing theft of CSRF tokens and forging of requests to create unauthorized administrative users. The vulnerability affects versions prior to 7.14.6 and 8.7.1.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 7.14.6>= 8.0.0, < 8.7.1CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify SuiteCRM versionCheck the version file in the SuiteCRM root directory (usually VERSION file or similar), or access the Admin panel > System Information to view the installed version numberAffected if The installed version is below 7.14.6 or between 8.0.0 and 8.7.1 (exclusive)
-
Confirm Edit Profile page existsNavigate to the Edit Profile page in the SuiteCRM interface (usually at /index.php?module=Users&action=EditView or similar), verify the page loads and contains input fieldsAffected if The Edit Profile page is accessible to authenticated users in the environment
-
Locate the Publish Key fieldOn the Edit Profile page, identify the 'Publish Key' input field (this is a profile field that may be present depending on configuration)Affected if The 'Publish Key' field is present and can accept user input
-
Verify authenticated access existsConfirm that regular authenticated users (non-admin) can access and modify their own profile settingsAffected if Non-administrative users can access profile edit functionality
A user is affected if their SuiteCRM installation runs version 7.x below 7.14.6 or version 8.x below 8.7.1 and authenticated users can access the Edit Profile page with the Publish Key field.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped7.14.68.7.1
Upgrade SuiteCRM to version 7.14.6, 8.7.1, or later. No workarounds are available.
7.14.6 for 7.x branch; 8.7.1 for 8.x branch
- 1. Backup your SuiteCRM database and application files before upgrading
- 2. If running SuiteCRM 7.x version (< 7.14.6), upgrade to version 7.14.6
- 3. If running SuiteCRM 8.x version (>= 8.0.0, < 8.7.1), upgrade to version 8.7.1
- 4. Clear application cache after upgrade (delete cache/ directory contents)
- 5. Verify the upgrade was successful by logging in and checking the SuiteCRM version
- 6. Confirm the Edit Profile page 'Publish Key' field now properly sanitizes input
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,472.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-50335 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-50335 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data