CVE-2024-50454
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedMissing Authorization vulnerability in Benjamin Denis SEOPress wp-seopress allows Exploiting Incorrectly Configured Access Control Security Levels.This issue affects SEOPress: from n/a through <= 8.1.1.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceMissing authorization vulnerability in SEOPress WordPress plugin allows attackers to access functionality without proper access control checks. The issue stems from incorrectly configured access control security levels that fail to validate user permissions before executing sensitive operations.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify if SEOPress plugin is installedCheck the WordPress plugins directory at wp-content/plugins/ or view the installed plugins list in WP Admin under Plugins > Installed PluginsAffected if SEOPress plugin is present in the WordPress installation
-
Determine the installed SEOPress versionIn WordPress Admin, go to Plugins > Installed Plugins and find SEOPress to see the version number, or check the main plugin file header in wp-content/plugins/seopress/seopress.phpAffected if The installed version has not been patched (no specific version range provided in CVE data)
-
Review user roles with administrative accessIn WordPress Admin, go to Users > All Users and audit accounts with Administrator role; check for unauthorized or unexpected admin accountsAffected if Unexpected or unknown administrator accounts exist, indicating potential exploitation
-
Inspect SEOPress settings for unauthorized changesNavigate to SEOPress settings in WP Admin (usually under SEO > SEOPress) and review all configuration pages for any unauthorized modifications to plugin settingsAffected if Plugin configuration has been changed without legitimate admin action
A defender is affected if the SEOPress plugin is installed and the installed version is unpatched, or if unauthorized admin accounts or configuration changes are detected indicating exploitation of the missing authorization flaw.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpdate to the patched version of SEOPress when released. Until then, restrict administrator access to the plugin and monitor for unauthorized configuration changes.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,560.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-50454 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-50454 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data