Path TraversalWeakness · CWE-22

CVE-2024-50508

HIGH · 7.5 CVSS v3.1 Published 2024-10-30
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
84/100
Remediation priority · High
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal') vulnerability in Chetan Khandla Woocommerce Product Design woo-product-design allows Path Traversal.This issue affects Woocommerce Product Design: from n/a through <= 1.0.0.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

A path traversal vulnerability in the WooCommerce Product Design plugin (versions <= 1.0.0) allows unauthenticated attackers to access files outside the intended restricted directory by manipulating file path inputs. The CVSS 7.5 score indicates high severity due to the potential for reading sensitive system files.

MitigationUpdate to the latest version of the plugin when available. Apply input validation and proper path sanitization to ensure file paths resolve within the intended directory boundaries. If no patch exists, implement web application firewall rules to block path traversal sequences (e.g., ../).

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
None
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Verify WooCommerce Product Design plugin is installed
    Check the WordPress plugins directory or wp-admin/plugins.php for 'WooCommerce Product Design' or 'pd' plugin listing
    Affected if Plugin is present in the WordPress installation
  2. Determine installed plugin version
    Access the plugin file header (typically in /wp-content/plugins/pd-product-designer/index.php or similar) and locate the 'Version:' field, or view via WordPress admin Plugins page
    Affected if Version number is 1.0.0 or lower
  3. Identify plugin directory path
    Locate the base plugin directory - typically wp-content/plugins/pd-product-designer/ or similar naming pattern containing 'product-design' or 'pd'
    Affected if Plugin files exist in the WordPress plugins folder
  4. Check for file upload or file access functionality
    Review plugin source code for functions handling file paths - look for include/require statements, file_get_contents, or file upload handlers that accept user-supplied paths
    Affected if The plugin contains file operation code that processes user input as file paths without proper sanitization
  5. Test for path traversal vulnerability
    If the plugin exposes an endpoint accepting file paths, attempt a controlled test request with a path like ../../../../wp-config.php (on a non-production test environment only)
    Affected if The plugin accepts and processes path traversal sequences (../) in file path parameters

The environment is affected if the WooCommerce Product Design plugin is installed with version 1.0.0 or lower and contains file handling functionality that processes user-supplied paths.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Update to the latest version of the plugin when available. Apply input validation and proper path sanitization to ensure file paths resolve within the intended directory boundaries. If no patch exists, implement web application firewall rules to block path traversal sequences (e.g., ../).

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation3.0 h
  • Testing2.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
9.0 hours of engineering $1,600
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,560.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-50508 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-50508 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data