CVE-2024-5082
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA Remote Code Execution vulnerability has been discovered in Sonatype Nexus Repository 2. This issue affects Nexus Repository 2 OSS/Pro versions up to and including 2.15.1.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceA Remote Code Execution vulnerability exists in Sonatype Nexus Repository 2 OSS/Pro affecting versions up to and including 2.15.1. The vulnerability allows authenticated attackers to execute arbitrary code on the affected system via the Nexus repository manager interface.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- Authentication
- X
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- X
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Nexus Repository 2 versionLocate the installed version of Nexus Repository 2 (typically visible in the web UI footer, in the administration panel, or via the API at /nexus/service/local/status)Affected if The installed version is 2.15.1 or lower (any version up to and including 2.15.1)
-
Confirm the product is Nexus Repository 2Verify the running instance is Sonatype Nexus Repository 2 OSS or Pro (not Nexus 3)Affected if The product is Nexus Repository 2 version 2.15.1 or lower
-
Assess web interface accessibilityDetermine if the Nexus web interface (typically on ports 8081 or 8443) is accessible from network locations beyond localhostAffected if The administrative interface is network-accessible and the version is 2.15.1 or lower
-
Review enabled authentication methodsCheck whether authentication is enabled for the Nexus administrative interface and identify valid user accountsAffected if Valid user credentials exist and the version is 2.15.1 or lower (authentication is required for exploitation but may be compromised)
A user is affected if Nexus Repository 2 version 2.15.1 or lower is running and the web interface is accessible with valid authentication credentials.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpgrade to a patched version of Nexus Repository 2 (version 2.15.2 or later). If immediate patching is not possible, restrict network access to the Nexus administrative interface and implement strong authentication controls.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,648.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-5082 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-5082 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data