CVE-2024-50953
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAn issue in XINJE XL5E-16T V3.7.2a allows attackers to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) via a crafted Modbus message.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceThe XINJE XL5E-16T PLC (version V3.7.2a) can be forced into a denial-of-service condition when it receives a specifically crafted Modbus message. The vulnerability lies in how the device's Modbus implementation handles certain malformed or specially constructed protocol messages, causing the device to become unresponsive or require restart.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the PLC modelAccess the PLC configuration software (XINJE PLC Programming Tool) or check the device label to confirm the exact model number is XL5E-16TAffected if The device is not an XINJE XL5E-16T PLC, then this CVE does not apply
-
Check the firmware versionUsing the XINJE PLC programming software, navigate to the system information or device status section to retrieve the installed firmware versionAffected if The firmware version is V3.7.2a; versions other than V3.7.2a may have different vulnerability status
-
Verify Modbus communication is enabledCheck the PLC configuration or communication settings in the XINJE programming tool to determine if Modbus RTU or Modbus TCP is configured and activeAffected if Modbus communication is enabled and configured on the device; if disabled, the attack surface may be reduced
-
Monitor for device responsiveness issuesObserve or log whether the PLC becomes unresponsive, experiences communication failures, or requires power cycling or restart to recoverAffected if The device exhibits unexplained unresponsiveness or requires frequent restarts, especially after receiving Modbus traffic
You are affected if you have an XINJE XL5E-16T PLC running firmware V3.7.2a with Modbus communication enabled, and the device shows signs of becoming unresponsive or requiring restart.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply vendor-supplied firmware updates when available; prior to patching, implement network segmentation to restrict Modbus access to authorized endpoints only, and monitor for anomalous Modbus traffic patterns.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-50953 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-50953 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data