Incorrect Default PermissionsWeakness · CWE-276

CVE-2024-51162

HIGH · 8.8 CVSS v3.1 Published 2024-11-20
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
94/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
An issue in Audimex EE versions 15.1.20 and earlier allowing a remote attacker to escalate privileges. Analyzing the offline client code, it was identified that it is possible for any user (with any privilege) of Audimex to dump the whole Audimex database. This gives visibility upon password hashes of any user, ongoing audit data and more.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

In Audimax EE versions 15.1.20 and earlier, a vulnerability in the offline client code allows any authenticated user—even those with minimal privileges—to dump the entire Audimex database. This exposes all user password hashes, ongoing audit data, and other sensitive information, effectively enabling privilege escalation through credential theft.

MitigationUpgrade to a version newer than 15.1.20 if available; if no patch exists, implement compensating controls such as network segmentation, database access monitoring, and mandatory password resets for all users while investigating alternative mitigations.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify Audimax EE installation
    Search for Audimax EE installation directories, check installed programs list, or query system for 'Audimax' binary files and components
    Affected if Audimax EE software is present on the system
  2. Determine installed version
    Locate version information in the Audimax EE installation (typically in an 'about' dialog, version file, or application metadata) and compare to 15.1.20
    Affected if The installed version is 15.1.20 or earlier
  3. Verify offline client feature availability
    Check if the offline client module/component is installed and accessible within the Audimax EE application
    Affected if The offline client feature is present and accessible to users
  4. Audit user account privileges
    Review user accounts configured in Audimax EE and their assigned privilege levels, particularly looking for accounts with only minimal permissions
    Affected if There are authenticated users with any privilege level using the system (the vulnerability affects all authenticated users)
  5. Review database export/dump capabilities
    Inspect Audimax EE logs, audit trails, or configuration settings for evidence of database export operations performed by standard users
    Affected if Low-privilege users have the ability to export or dump database contents

You are affected if Audimax EE version 15.1.20 or earlier is installed and the offline client feature is accessible to authenticated users, regardless of their privilege level.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Upgrade to a version newer than 15.1.20 if available; if no patch exists, implement compensating controls such as network segmentation, database access monitoring, and mandatory password resets for all users while investigating alternative mitigations.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation6.0 h
  • Implementation12.0 h
  • Testing8.0 h
  • Review / QA6.0 h
32.0 hours of engineering $5,640
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $9,024.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-51162 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-51162 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data