CVE-2024-51392
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAn issue in OpenKnowledgeMaps Headstart v7 allows a remote attacker to escalate privileges via the url parameter of the getPDF.php component
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceOpenKnowledgeMaps Headstart v7 contains a privilege escalation vulnerability in the getPDF.php component. The url parameter is not properly validated, allowing a remote attacker to potentially manipulate the parameter to escalate privileges.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Locate the getPDF.php fileSearch the web server document root for the file getPDF.php - common paths include /include/, /lib/, or /api/ directories within the Headstart installationAffected if The file getPDF.php exists in the application directory structure
-
Confirm Headstart versionCheck the installed version of OpenKnowledgeMaps Headstart by examining version files, composer.json, or the application metadata (often in a VERSION, package.json, or similar file in the root directory)Affected if The installed version is v7 or falls within the v7.x release line
-
Verify url parameter is accessibleExamine the getPDF.php file to confirm it accepts a 'url' parameter (look for $_GET['url'] or $_POST['url'] in the code)Affected if The getPDF.php script processes a 'url' parameter without documented input validation or allowlisting
-
Test parameter manipulationSend a crafted request to getPDF.php with an arbitrary url parameter value (e.g., ?url=http://example.com) and observe if the application processes it without sanitization or rejectionAffected if The url parameter accepts and processes values without validation or allowlist enforcement
A user is affected if they run OpenKnowledgeMaps Headstart v7 and the getPDF.php component is accessible with an unvalidated url parameter that can be manipulated for privilege escalation.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement strict input validation and sanitization on the url parameter in getPDF.php. Use allowlists for permitted values and validate that the URL follows expected patterns before processing.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,848.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-51392 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-51392 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data