CVE-2024-51745
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedWasmtime is a fast and secure runtime for WebAssembly. Wasmtime's filesystem sandbox implementation on Windows blocks access to special device filenames such as "COM1", "COM2", "LPT0", "LPT1", and so on, however it did not block access to the special device filenames which use superscript digits, such as "COM¹", "COM²", "LPT⁰", "LPT¹", and so on. Untrusted Wasm programs that are given access to any filesystem directory could bypass the sandbox and access devices through those special device filenames with superscript digits, and through them gain access peripheral devices connected to the computer, or network resources mapped to those devices. This can include modems, printers, network printers, and any other device connected to a serial or parallel port, including emulated USB serial ports. Patch releases for Wasmtime have been issued as 24.0.2, 25.0.3, and 26.0.1. Users of Wasmtime 23.0.x and prior are recommended to upgrade to one of these patched versions. There are no known workarounds for this issue. Affected Windows users are recommended to upgrade.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceWasmtime's Windows filesystem sandbox fails to block access to special device filenames using Unicode superscript digits (COM¹, COM², LPT⁰, LPT¹), allowing untrusted WebAssembly programs to bypass the sandbox and access serial/parallel ports and connected peripherals including modems, printers, and emulated USB serial ports.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 24.0.2= 25.0.0= 25.0.1= 25.0.2= 26.0.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed Wasmtime versionRun `wasmtime --version` or check the version of the wasmtime library/binary in your deploymentAffected if The version is less than 24.0.2, or equals 25.0.0, 25.0.1, 25.0.2, or 26.0.0
-
Confirm operating system is WindowsVerify the host system is running Windows, as this sandbox bypass applies only to Windows environmentsAffected if Wasmtime is running on Windows and the version is in the affected range
-
Determine if filesystem sandboxing is enabledReview Wasmtime configuration for filesystem sandboxing settings, such as the `--dir` or `wasmtime::config::wasm::fs::Wasi` options used when spawning WebAssembly modulesAffected if Filesystem sandboxing is configured and the Wasmtime version is vulnerable
-
Test for superscript device filename accessAttempt to open a file with a superscript digit in the name (for example, COM¹, COM², LPT⁰, or LPT¹) from an untrusted WebAssembly module running under the sandboxAffected if The sandbox permits access to these special device filenames on Windows
You are affected if Wasmtime versions 24.0.0-24.0.1, 25.0.0-25.0.2, or 26.0.0 are running on Windows with filesystem sandboxing enabled.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped24.0.2
Upgrade Wasmtime to version 24.0.2, 25.0.3, or 26.0.1. No workarounds exist; affected Windows users must upgrade.
Wasmtime 26.0.1 (or minimum 24.0.2 / 25.0.3)
- Identify the current installed version of Wasmtime using `wasmtime --version` or checking your dependency manager
- For package managers: update Wasmtime to version 26.0.1 (or 25.0.3 if 26.x is not compatible)
- For direct binary installation: download the appropriate Wasmtime release for your platform from the official GitHub releases page
- Verify the upgrade was successful by running `wasmtime --version` and confirming it shows 24.0.2, 25.0.3, or 26.0.1 or later
- Rebuild and redeploy any Wasm modules that depend on Wasmtime to ensure compatibility with the new version
- Test that Wasm modules function correctly with the updated runtime
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing5.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,464.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-51745 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-51745 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data