CVE-2024-51818
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedImproper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection') vulnerability in radykal Fancy Product Designer fancy-product-designer.This issue affects Fancy Product Designer: from n/a through <= 6.4.3.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceSQL injection vulnerability in Fancy Product Designer plugin (version <= 6.4.3) allows attackers to inject malicious SQL commands through unsanitized input fields, potentially enabling data exfiltration, database manipulation, or complete system compromise.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- Low
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Locate the Fancy Product Designer plugin installationCheck the WordPress plugins directory (wp-content/plugins/) for a folder named 'fancy-product-designer' or similar variant. Alternatively, search for files containing 'Fancy_Product_Designer' class definition.Affected if The plugin folder exists in the WordPress installation
-
Identify the installed plugin versionOpen the main plugin file (typically fancy-product-designer.php or similar) and locate the 'Version' header comment, or check the readme.txt file for the 'Stable tag' entry.Affected if The version listed is 6.4.3 or any version lower than 6.4.3
-
Review database query handling codeSearch the plugin directory for PHP files containing direct SQL query construction (look for $wpdb->prepare, $wpdb->query, or direct concatenation of variables into SQL strings). Examine files in includes/ or classes/ folders.Affected if Code contains unsanitized user input passed directly into SQL queries without prepared statements
-
Check for exposed adminajax or API endpointsExamine the plugin's PHP files for admin-ajax.php or REST API route registrations that accept user input and pass it to database queries. Look for do_action('wp_ajax_') or register_rest_route() calls.Affected if The plugin exposes endpoints that accept user-supplied parameters used in database queries without sanitization
-
Audit input parameter handlingReview PHP files that process GET, POST, or request parameters (check for $_GET, $_POST, $_REQUEST usage) and trace whether those values flow into SQL queries without proper escaping or prepared statement usage.Affected if User-supplied parameters are used in SQL queries without parameterized binding
If the Fancy Product Designer plugin is installed with a version of 6.4.3 or lower and contains code that passes user input directly into SQL queries, the environment is affected by this SQL injection vulnerability.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpgrade to the latest version of Fancy Product Designer and audit all database queries to implement parameterized queries or prepared statements for user-supplied input.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,480.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-51818 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-51818 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data