CVE-2024-52312
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedDue to inconsistent authorization permissions, data.all may allow an external actor with an authenticated account to perform restricted operations against DataSets and Environments.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidencedata.all contains an authorization flaw where authenticated users can access restricted DataSets and Environments due to inconsistent permission checks, allowing privilege escalation beyond their intended access level.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 1.0.0, < 2.6.1CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- Low
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed data.all versionCheck the deployed version by inspecting the package.json file, Docker image tag, Helm chart values, or CloudFormation/Stackset outputs depending on your deployment methodAffected if version is 1.0.0 or higher but lower than 2.6.1
-
Confirm DataSet feature is activeVerify that the DataSet module is enabled by checking the deployed infrastructure configuration or by logging into the application and attempting to access the DataSets interfaceAffected if DataSets feature is accessible to authenticated users in your environment
-
Confirm Environment feature is activeVerify that the Environment module is enabled by checking the deployed infrastructure configuration or by logging into the application and attempting to access the Environments interfaceAffected if Environments feature is accessible to authenticated users in your environment
-
Review user permission assignmentsExamine which IAM roles and permissions are assigned to authenticated users in your data.all deployment, particularly focusing on cross-account or cross-team permission grantsAffected if authenticated users have been granted any level of access to DataSets or Environments that should be restricted
Your environment is affected if the installed data.all version falls within 1.0.0 to 2.6.1 and authenticated users can access DataSet or Environment resources that should be restricted based on your intended access control model
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped2.6.1
Review and standardize authorization logic across all DataSet and Environment operations to ensure proper permission validation before allowing access.
2.6.1
- Upgrade Data.all to version 2.6.1 or later to resolve the incorrect authorization vulnerability
- Test the upgrade in a non-production environment to verify authorization controls function correctly
- After successful testing, deploy the upgrade to production
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation12.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $7,808.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-52312 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-52312 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data