CVE-2024-52547
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAn authenticated attacker can trigger a stack based buffer overflow in the DHIP Service (TCP port 80). This vulnerability has been resolved in firmware version 2.800.0000000.8.R.20241111.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability exists in the DHIP service listening on TCP port 80. An authenticated attacker can exploit this memory corruption flaw to potentially execute arbitrary code. The vulnerability is confirmed fixed in firmware version 2.800.0000000.8.R.20241111.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- High
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify if DHIP service is running on TCP port 80Use netstat or ss to check for services listening on TCP port 80. Run 'netstat -tlnp | grep :80' or 'ss -tlnp | grep :80' and examine the output to determine if the DHIP service is bound to port 80Affected if DHIP service is confirmed listening on TCP port 80
-
Verify authentication is enabled for DHIP accessAccess the device administrative interface or configuration files and check the DHIP service settings to confirm whether authentication is required for DHIP connections on port 80Affected if Authentication is disabled, optional, or improperly configured for the DHIP service
-
Check installed firmware versionRetrieve the current firmware version from the device system settings, admin panel, or CLI command such as 'show version' or 'firmware version'. Compare the obtained version against the fixed version 2.800.0000000.8.R.20241111Affected if Firmware version is lower than 2.800.0000000.8.R.20241111
Environment is affected if DHIP service is running on TCP port 80 AND either authentication is not enforced OR the firmware version is below 2.800.0000000.8.R.20241111
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedApply firmware version 2.800.0000000.8.R.20241111 or later to all affected devices. Verify authentication controls are properly configured to limit exposure.
2.800.0000000.8.R.20241111
- Obtain firmware version 2.800.0000000.8.R.20241111 from the device vendor's official firmware download page
- Log in to the device management interface with administrative credentials
- Navigate to the firmware upgrade or system update section
- Upload and install firmware version 2.800.0000000.8.R.20241111
- Reboot the device to complete the firmware update
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,984.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-52547 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-52547 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data