Monitouch V SftApplication · Fujielectric

CVE-2024-5271

HIGH · 7.8 CVSS v3.1 Published 2024-05-30
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 6.2.3.0 or later.
See remediation →
81/100
Remediation priority · High
No privileges

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Fuji Electric Monitouch V-SFT is vulnerable to an out-of-bounds write because of a type confusion, which could result in arbitrary code execution.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

Fuji Electric Monitouch V-SFT contains a type confusion vulnerability that leads to an out-of-bounds write condition. This memory corruption can be exploited to achieve arbitrary code execution on the affected system.

MitigationApply vendor patch when available; if no patch exists, implement network segmentation to minimize exposure and monitor for indicators of compromise. Consider compensating controls such as restricting access to HMI interfaces.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Monitouch V SftApplication
Affected:< 6.2.3.0

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Local
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
Required
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Verify Monitouch V-SFT installation exists
    Search for Monitouch V-SFT in installed programs (Windows: Check Add/Remove Programs, Program Files; Linux: Check /opt or application directories). Look for executable files named V-SFT, sft, or related HMI development/runtime files.
    Affected if Monitouch V-SFT software is present on the system
  2. Determine installed version number
    Right-click on the main V-SFT executable (commonly named V-SFT.exe or similar in the installation directory), select Properties, then view the Details tab for version information. Alternatively, check the version listed in Add/Remove Programs.
    Affected if Version is displayed as a number below 6.2.3.0
  3. Compare version against vulnerability range
    Take the identified version number and compare it to the affected range: any version less than 6.2.3.0 is vulnerable. Note that version 6.2.3.0 itself and higher are not affected.
    Affected if Installed version is less than 6.2.3.0
  4. Verify if HMI runtime is exposed on network
    Check if the V-SFT runtime service or HMI interface is listening on network ports. Use 'netstat -an' or similar tools to identify listening ports associated with the software. For HMI applications, common ports may be in use.
    Affected if HMI runtime/service is accessible over network and version is vulnerable

System is affected if Monitouch V-SFT is installed with any version lower than 6.2.3.0, particularly if the HMI runtime is network-accessible.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Upgrade available Upgrade to 6.2.3.0 or later
Fixed in 6.2.3.0
Interim mitigation

Apply vendor patch when available; if no patch exists, implement network segmentation to minimize exposure and monitor for indicators of compromise. Consider compensating controls such as restricting access to HMI interfaces.

Recommended fix High confidence

6.2.3.0

  1. Contact Fuji Electric to obtain the Monitouch V-SFT version 6.2.3.0 or later from their official support channels
  2. Review all system backups before performing the upgrade
  3. Follow Fuji Electric's official upgrade procedure for Monitouch V-SFT software
  4. After upgrading, verify the version number matches 6.2.3.0 or later
  5. Test critical operations to ensure normal functionality post-upgrade

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Fix this in Monitouch V Sft Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation8.0 h
  • Implementation12.0 h
  • Testing6.0 h
  • Review / QA4.0 h
30.0 hours of engineering $5,380
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $8,608.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-5271 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-5271 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data