CVE-2024-52732
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIncorrect access control in wms-Warehouse management system-zeqp v2.20.9.1 due to the token value of the zeqp system being reused.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceIn the wms-Warehouse management system-zeqp v2.20.9.1, the authentication token mechanism allows token value reuse, enabling attackers to replay previously issued tokens to gain unauthorized access to the system. This incorrect access control stems from insufficient token validation, where tokens are not properly invalidated after use or expiration.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed version of wms-zeqpLocate the version information for the wms-warehouse management system-zeqp installation. This may be in the application header, a version file in the installation directory, or returned by an API endpoint like /api/version or /about. Compare this to the affected version v2.20.9.1.Affected if The installed version matches or is below v2.20.9.1 and the token reuse vulnerability has not been patched.
-
Test token replay with a previously used tokenObtain a valid authentication token from the system (for example, by logging in). Then attempt to use that same token again to access protected endpoints. Record whether the request succeeds or fails.Affected if The system accepts and validates the reused token, allowing access without generating a new token.
-
Test token expiration validationObtain a token and either wait for any defined expiration period to pass, or manually inspect the token to determine its expiration timestamp. Attempt to use the token after the expiration time has elapsed.Affected if The system accepts and validates expired tokens, allowing continued access beyond the token validity period.
-
Inspect token validation logicIf code access is available, review the authentication module (typically in the login or token validation handler) to verify whether the system checks token uniqueness, maintains a token usage ledger, or implements single-use validation. Look for any server-side tracking of issued tokens.Affected if The code lacks server-side token tracking, single-use validation, or proper invalidation logic.
A user is affected if they are running wms-zeqp version v2.20.9.1 (or an unpatched earlier version) and the system permits reuse of the same authentication token or accepts expired tokens for access.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement proper token lifecycle management including expiration, single-use validation, and secure invalidation. Replace the token mechanism with standards like JWT with short expiration times or implement server-side token tracking.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation16.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $8,960.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-52732 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-52732 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data