CVE-2024-52818
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAdobe Experience Manager versions 6.5.21 and earlier are affected by a stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability that could be abused by an attacker to inject malicious scripts into vulnerable form fields. Malicious JavaScript may be executed in a victim’s browser when they browse to the page containing the vulnerable field.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceAdobe Experience Manager versions 6.5.21 and earlier contain a stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in form fields. Attackers can inject malicious JavaScript that persists in the system and executes when users view pages containing the affected fields.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 6.5.22.0< 2024.11.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check Adobe Experience Manager versionAccess the AEM console and navigate to Help > About Adobe Experience Manager, or check the version.properties file in the crx-quickstart folder. Alternatively, query the version endpoint at /system/console/bundles or check the AEM SDK version.Affected if The installed version is earlier than 6.5.22.0 or earlier than 2024.11.0, placing it within the affected range.
-
Identify deployed form componentsReview the AEM content structure under /content or /apps for pages using Adaptive Form components (core form components), Foundation form components, or custom form implementations. Use the AEM search or Site Admin to locate pages containing form elements.Affected if The AEM instance hosts pages or templates that include form fields where user input is collected and stored.
-
Examine form field input validation configurationOpen the form field component dialog in AEM Forms or check the XML configuration of Adaptive Forms under /content/forms/af. Inspect the validation settings for each form field to determine if input validation and constraints are properly configured.Affected if Form fields lack input validation rules, pattern constraints, or allow unrestricted text input that could accept malicious scripts.
-
Review output encoding settings for form componentsCheck the form container or individual field component properties in the AEM edit dialog. Verify the settings under the HTML Property Mapping or the Display Text configuration to confirm output encoding is enabled for user-submitted content.Affected if Output encoding is disabled or not explicitly configured on form fields, allowing stored scripts to render unescaped in the browser.
The environment is affected if the installed AEM version is below 6.5.22.0 or below 2024.11.0 AND the system uses form fields that accept user input without proper input validation or output encoding.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped6.5.22.02024.11.0
Update Adobe Experience Manager to version 6.5.22 or later to patch the vulnerability. Alternatively, implement input validation and output encoding on form fields, or deploy a WAF rule to filter malicious scripts.
Adobe Experience Manager 6.5.22.0 or 2024.11.0 and later
- Backup the Adobe Experience Manager instance and its data before proceeding with any upgrade
- Review Adobe's official upgrade documentation and release notes for version 6.5.22.0 or 2024.11.0 to understand the upgrade process
- Test the upgrade in a non-production/staging environment first to ensure compatibility with custom code and configurations
- Stop the AEM instance and any related services
- Perform the upgrade to AEM 6.5.22.0 (for 6.x customers) or 2024.11.0 (for Cloud Service customers) following Adobe's documented upgrade procedure
- After upgrade, verify that the form fields mentioned in the vulnerability are no longer susceptible to XSS injection
- Restart the AEM instance and validate all workflows and integrations are functioning correctly
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,656.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-52818 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-52818 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data