Experience ManagerApplication · Adobe

CVE-2024-52842

MEDIUM · 5.4 CVSS v3.1 Published 2024-12-10
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 6.5.22.0 / 2024.11.0 or later.
See remediation →
58/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Adobe Experience Manager versions 6.5.21 and earlier are affected by a stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability that could be abused by an attacker to inject malicious scripts into vulnerable form fields. Malicious JavaScript may be executed in a victim’s browser when they browse to the page containing the vulnerable field.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

Adobe Experience Manager versions 6.5.21 and earlier contain a stored Cross-Site Scripting vulnerability in form fields. Attackers can inject malicious JavaScript payloads into form inputs that persist on the page, which then execute in victim browsers when they view the affected content.

MitigationUpgrade to AEM 6.5.22 or later. Additionally, implement output encoding and input validation on form fields to prevent XSS injection.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Experience ManagerApplication
Affected:< 6.5.22.0< 2024.11.0

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
Required
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
Low
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Check installed AEM version
    Locate the AEM version number in the product UI (Help > About Adobe Experience Manager) or check the version.properties file in the crx-quickstart folder
    Affected if The version is below 6.5.22.0 or below 2024.11.0
  2. Identify if AEM Forms is enabled
    Check if the AEM Forms addon is installed by navigating to Tools > Forms in the AEM console or checking for /aem/forms in the URL
    Affected if AEM Forms module is present and active
  3. Verify form field input validation settings
    Review form field configurations in the Forms editor - check if Input Validation is configured for text fields that accept user input
    Affected if Form fields lack input validation rules or allow raw HTML/script input
  4. Inspect stored form data for unsanitized content
    Examine form submissions in the AEM repository (CRXDE Lite under /content/forms/af) or form data model outputs for any script tags or JavaScript event handlers
    Affected if Form data contains unencoded script tags or event handler attributes like onerror, onload, onclick
  5. Review output encoding on form rendering
    Check the form template or adaptive form fragment code to verify if HTL/Sightly encoding is applied to user-submitted values when rendered
    Affected if User input from forms is rendered without proper HTML encoding or output escaping

A user is affected if their AEM version is below 6.5.22.0 or below 2024.11.0 AND they have AEM Forms enabled with form fields that accept user input without validation or encoding.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Upgrade available Upgrade to 6.5.22.0 / 2024.11.0 or later
Fixed in 6.5.22.02024.11.0
Interim mitigation

Upgrade to AEM 6.5.22 or later. Additionally, implement output encoding and input validation on form fields to prevent XSS injection.

Recommended fix High confidence

Adobe Experience Manager 6.5.22.0 (6.5.x line) or 2024.11.0 (2024 release line)

  1. 1. Identify the current Adobe Experience Manager version in use
  2. 2. For AEM 6.5.x line: Upgrade to version 6.5.22.0 or later
  3. 3. For AEM as a Cloud Service / 2024 releases: Upgrade to version 2024.11.0 or later
  4. 4. After upgrade, verify the XSS fix is applied by testing form field inputs with script tags
  5. 5. Confirm that stored scripts are not executed when form pages are rendered

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Fix this in Experience Manager Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation8.0 h
  • Testing6.0 h
  • Review / QA4.0 h
22.0 hours of engineering $3,860
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-52842 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-52842 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data