CVE-2024-52880
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAn issue was discovered in Insyde InsydeH2O kernel 5.2 before version 05.29.50, kernel 5.3 before version 05.38.50, kernel 5.4 before version 05.46.50, kernel 5.5 before version 05.54.50, kernel 5.6 before version 05.61.50, and kernel 5.7 before version 05.70.50. In VariableRuntimeDxe driver, SecureBootHandler uses DataSize and VariableNameSize when determining if the data or name are in the buffer, but these are supplied by the caller and therefore cannot be trusted.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceBuffer boundary validation vulnerability in Insyde InsydeH2O UEFI firmware's VariableRuntimeDxe driver. The SecureBootHandler function uses caller-supplied DataSize and VariableNameSize parameters without validation when checking if data or names fit within buffers, allowing potential out-of-bounds read/write operations.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 5.2, < 5.29.50>= 5.3, < 5.38.50>= 5.4, < 5.46.50>= 5.5, < 5.54.50>= 5.6, < 5.61.50>= 5.7, < 5.70.50CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- High
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify if system uses InsydeH2O UEFI firmwareRun 'dmidecode -s bios-version' or check /sys/class/dmi/id/bios_version, and examine the vendor string via 'dmidecode -s bios-vendor' or /sys/class/dmi/id/bios_vendorAffected if The BIOS vendor is Insyde or the firmware version string contains InsydeH2O references
-
Extract the Insyde Kernel version from UEFI firmwareParse the UEFI firmware version string - the Insyde Kernel version is typically encoded in the firmware version (for example, version 5.2.x indicates Insyde Kernel 5.2). Use 'dmidecode -s bios-version' output and compare the numeric portion against Insyde version numberingAffected if The extracted Insyde Kernel version falls within any of these ranges: >= 5.2 and < 5.29.50; >= 5.3 and < 5.38.50; >= 5.4 and < 5.46.50; >= 5.5 and < 5.54.50; >= 5.6 and < 5.61.50; >= 5.7 and < 5.70.50
-
Verify SecureBoot is enabledCheck SecureBoot status by running 'mokutil --sb-state' or 'powershell -command "Confirm-SecureBootUEFI"' on Windows, or check via 'efi-readvar' on LinuxAffected if SecureBoot is enabled - the vulnerable SecureBootHandler function is invoked when SecureBoot processes variables
-
Confirm VariableRuntimeDxe driver presenceInspect UEFI firmware image or use tools like 'uefi-firmware-parser' or 'chipsec' to extract and examine the VariableRuntimeDxe driver for the SecureBootHandler functionAffected if The VariableRuntimeDxe driver is present and contains the SecureBootHandler function (this is typically present in InsydeH2O firmware with SecureBoot support)
The system is affected if it runs InsydeH2O UEFI firmware with an Insyde Kernel version matching the affected ranges and has SecureBoot enabled, allowing the vulnerable SecureBootHandler function to be invoked.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped5.29.505.38.505.46.50
Apply vendor-provided UEFI firmware updates that address this vulnerability for the specific kernel version in use. The vulnerability is in the firmware itself—no software-only workaround exists.
InsydeH2O kernel 5.2 to >=05.29.50; kernel 5.3 to >=05.38.50; kernel 5.4 to >=05.46.50; kernel 5.5 to >=05.54.50
- Contact your hardware OEM (Original Equipment Manufacturer) to obtain the firmware update containing the InsydeH2O kernel fix
- Apply the firmware update using the vendor's recommended process (typically via BIOS/UEFI update utility or firmware flashing tool)
- After updating, verify the InsydeH2O kernel version matches or exceeds the fixed version for your kernel branch (05.29.50 for 5.2, 05.38.50 for 5.3, 05.46.50 for 5.4, or 05.54.50 for 5.5)
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation8.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing12.0 h
- Review / QA6.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $8,320.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-52880 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-52880 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data