Mobile AccessApplication · Checkpoint

CVE-2024-52888

MEDIUM · 5.4 CVSS v3.1 Published 2025-04-27
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
58/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
For an authenticated end-user the portal may run a script while attempting to display a directory or some file's properties.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

A cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in the web portal where an authenticated user's browser may execute malicious scripts when the portal attempts to display properties of a directory or file. The vulnerability occurs due to insufficient sanitization of user-controlled input or file metadata within the property display functionality.

MitigationImplement proper output encoding and input validation for all data displayed in directory and file property views. Apply context-appropriate escaping (HTML, URL, JavaScript) to prevent script injection.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Mobile AccessApplication
Affected:all versions
Remote Access VpnApplication
Affected:all versions

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
Required
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
Low
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Confirm Checkpoint product installation
    Identify if Checkpoint Mobile Access or Checkpoint Remote Access VPN software is installed on the system. Check installed programs list, running services, or consult system inventory for Checkpoint VPN client components.
    Affected if Either Checkpoint Mobile Access or Remote Access VPN is present on the system
  2. Verify web portal is accessible
    Attempt to access the Checkpoint VPN web portal URL (commonly on port 443 or 8443). Check if the portal login page loads for Remote Access or Mobile Access users.
    Affected if The Checkpoint VPN web portal interface is reachable and accepts authentication
  3. Check authenticated user access to file/directory properties
    Log into the web portal as an authenticated user. Navigate to features that display properties of directories or files, such as file sharing sections, network drive mappings, or file browse interfaces within the portal.
    Affected if Authenticated users can access any feature that displays directory or file metadata within the portal
  4. Inspect property display for lack of encoding
    Within the portal, observe how directory and file properties are rendered. Check the page source or browser developer tools to see if special characters in filenames or metadata are encoded (e.g., &lt; for <) or rendered as plain text.
    Affected if User-controlled filenames or file metadata are displayed without proper HTML encoding in the property view

A user is affected if Checkpoint Mobile Access or Remote Access VPN with its web portal is installed and authenticated users can access directory/file property display features where special characters render unescaped.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Implement proper output encoding and input validation for all data displayed in directory and file property views. Apply context-appropriate escaping (HTML, URL, JavaScript) to prevent script injection.

Fix this in Mobile Access Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation4.0 h
  • Testing3.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
11.0 hours of engineering $1,930
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,088.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-52888 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-52888 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data