IApplication · Ibm

CVE-2024-52895

MEDIUM · 6.5 CVSS v3.1 Published 2025-02-14
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
71/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
IBM i 7.4 and 7.5 is vulnerable to a database access denial of service caused by a bypass of a database capabilities restriction check. A privileged bad actor can remove or otherwise impact database infrastructure files resulting in incorrect behavior of software products that rely upon the database.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

IBM i versions 7.4 and 7.5 contain a vulnerability where a bypass of database capabilities restriction checks allows a privileged attacker to remove or impact database infrastructure files, causing a denial of service for software products that depend on the database.

MitigationApply IBM i patches as they become available. Restrict privileged access to database objects and implement file-level integrity monitoring on database infrastructure directories.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
IApplication
Affected:= 7.4= 7.5= 7.6

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
None
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Check IBM i version
    Run command: DSPSFWRSC (Display Software Resources) or use WRKHDWRSC *CMD to find the current IBM i release version. Alternatively, run 'GO CMDDSPJOB' and look for the System Version field.
    Affected if The installed version is 7.4, 7.5, or 7.6 (any of the affected versions listed).
  2. Identify privileged database user profiles
    Run command: DSPAUTUSR (*ALL) or use the IBM i Navigator to view user profiles with *ALLOBJ, *SECADM, or *DBMGTR special authorities. Focus on profiles that have database object access.
    Affected if Any privileged user profile with database administration capabilities exists and has access to database objects.
  3. Review database capabilities restrictions
    Check if database capabilities restrictions are configured using the 'CHGDBSRVA' (Change Database Server Attributes) command or through IBM i Navigator under Database > Server. Look for capability restrictions settings.
    Affected if Database capabilities restrictions are not properly configured or can be bypassed by privileged users.
  4. Inspect database infrastructure file integrity
    Use the 'WRKLNK' (Work with Object Links) command to examine database directories under /QIBM/UserData/DB2/ and /QSYS.LIB/DB2. Check for any unexpected deletions, modifications, or missing files in database infrastructure paths.
    Affected if Database infrastructure files have been removed, modified, or are missing, causing dependent software to fail.

A system is affected if it runs IBM i version 7.4, 7.5, or 7.6 AND has privileged users with the ability to bypass database capabilities restrictions, potentially evidenced by missing or modified database infrastructure files.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Apply IBM i patches as they become available. Restrict privileged access to database objects and implement file-level integrity monitoring on database infrastructure directories.

Fix this in I Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation6.0 h
  • Implementation12.0 h
  • Testing6.0 h
  • Review / QA3.0 h
27.0 hours of engineering $4,800
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $7,680.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-52895 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-52895 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data